|
Call for JCMT Proposals for Semester 10B
JCMT
Call for Proposals for Observing Time
Semester 10B
Submission Deadline:
For telescope time in Semester 10B (1st August 2010 - 31st January 2011)
the closing date for receipt of proposals is
Wednesday 17 March 2010
at
23:30 CET, 22:30 GMT, 18:30 EST, 15:30 PDT, 12:30 HST
(Applicants from the University of Hawaii have a different deadline).
NEWS for 10B
- SCUBA-2 is not offered in Semester 10B.
At this time (mid-February
2010)
Shared-Risks observing with one array at each wavelength is just
starting. An upgrade to 4 arrays at each wavelength will occur as soon as
possible afterwards, with a period of re-commissioning in the summer.
Once the instrument performance is characterized in that final
configuration a Special Call for SCUBA-2 proposals will be made for
the
remainder of the semester. The way in which successful SCUBA-2 proposals
are then prioritized and merged with or supplant previously approved
heterodyne proposals will be decided by each TAG.
- Overheads for pointing, focussing, and calibrations should
not be added to the time request.
Starting in semester 10B, calibration
observations (i.e. focus, pointing, tuning, flux calibrators) will no
longer be charged to science projects and instead will be
charged to an observatory accounting code. This means there is no need for
applicants to provide calibration overhead estimates in their proposals.
Only the time required to obtain the science
integration should be requested. The numbers provided by the
HiTEC
are based on empirical timings and thus should accurately reflect the
elapsed time to obtain a certain integration time. Other observing
overheads, such as those for instrument configuration, position switching,
etc., are already included in the
HiTEC
output.
Throughout each night the observatory will perform regular and
suitable calibration observations to ensure that all science data obtained
that night are sensibly calibrated. If a proposal demands more unusual
or more frequent calibrations then this requirement needs to be
clearly stated in the proposal and the time for these calibrations
requested explicitly. If you have queries about what our default
calibrations might be or what extra overheads are generated by
your calibration requirements please get in touch with
i.coulson @ jach.hawaii.edu .
Other Important Notes
- Be sure to submit your proposal to the
correct national queue.
Submitting to the wrong queue may result in the rejection of the
proposal.
-
The
HiTEC
gui should be used to calculate integration times for our heterodyne
receivers.
(HiTEC is the Heterodyne integration TimE
Calculator).
- Applicants are urged to itemize explicitly, in the Technical section of the
proposal, their inputs to their integration time calculations.
This is essential to allow the assigned Technical Assessor to confirm the
proposal's feasibility.
- The JCMT Legacy Surveys continue in 10B.
The JCMT Board has decided that the science goals of the surveys are to
be protected from duplication. Each proposal submitted is checked
for possible conflicts, but applicants should
ensure that, if their proposed targets overlap with
survey fields, sufficient justification is given in the
proposal as to how and why the proposed observations and science
differ from the survey project.
See below
for details on how to check for such overlap.
- JCMT operates a 12-hour night, running from approximately
7:30pm to 7:30am HST.
This table
shows source transit times during semester B.
- Your proposal must specify the weather conditions (read
opacity) that it requires or can tolerate.
The amount of time
available per weather/opacity band varies through the
year.
-
We particularly encourage the submission of projects which request
100hours or more of band 3,4,5 weather. Some description of
how large projects will be implemented should be included in the
proposal.
-
Large programs requiring band 1 or 2 weather are typically no longer than
50 hours. If more time is required for the project then a Long Term Status
proposal should be considered.
-
We also encourage the submission of projects which request
band 5 weather alone (0.2 < τ225GHz < 0.32).
- Applicants from countries of the European Union (except the UK and the
Netherlands) may be eligible for
RadioNet
funding
to aid with their travel expenses. (See below for further details).
          Contents
Available Instrumentation
Heterodyne Receivers -
General
status
Heterodyne Backend
Future Instrumentation
-
SCUBA-2 - an array receiver operating simultaneously at
850microns and 450microns.
-
The first two science-grade arrays (one at each wavelength)
arrived in Hawaii in July 2009 and were commissioned during
the fall of 2009. Shared-Risks observing is occurring
at the time of this Call, and SCUBA-2
will be upgraded in the spring of 2010 by the installation of 3
additional arrays at each wavelength. It is anticipated that the
instrument will be available at full capability sometime during
semester 10B, at which time a Special Call will be made.
- eSMA : JCMT can combine with SMA + CSO to form an
interferometer.
- A successful demonstration of the SMA-JCMT configuration
occurred in early February 2010. The next phase of eSMA is
expected to be a Pilot Programme, which will be available to the
partner countries.
- ROVER is a heterodyne polarimeter. It has not yet been fully
commissioned, and is not available for use at this time.
Supported Observing Modes:
Several modes of heterodyne observing are supported, including
- Single-spectrum samples
- Grid-mapping
- Jiggle-Chop mapping
- Jiggle-PSSW mapping
- Raster mapping
These observing modes
and the different switching schemes that go with them:
- beam-switch
- position-switch
- frequency-switch
are discussed in detail
here.
Calculating Integration Time and Overheads:
Our Heterodyne Integration TimE Calculator
HITEC,
can be used to calculate the integration time needed to reach a
given RMS per channel as a function of receiver, frequency,
observing mode, elevation and sky opacity.
The JCMT Observing Tool
(JCMTOT)
gives equivalent results.
Do not include overheads (for pointings and calibrations)
in the calculation of the amount of telescope time requested.
These activities will be accounted for separately.
This is a new policy in 10B.
JCMT Legacy Survey
JCMT Legacy Survey projects are playing
an increasing role in JCMT science operations. Seven
projects were approved by the JCMT Board in July 2005, and were
described in the Spring
2006 issue of the JCMT Newsletter. An overview of the
science goals and sources for each can be read here.
The JCMT Board has decided that the science goals of the survey
projects are to be protected against duplication by PI projects,
and that scientific merit should be the guiding principle in
cases of overlap. This means that no regions of the sky are
off-limits: PIs who submit proposals to observe fields claimed
by the survey projects will, however, be required to provide
additional justification for so doing. If that justification is
not provided or is insufficient, time will not be awarded. It is
anticipated that time will normally be awarded to PIs in such
cases only when the observations represent an extension of the
surveys: e.g., in depth, in area or in frequency. (Note that
these duplication rules do not apply to the University of Hawaii
queue.)
In order to enable proposers to identify potential
conflicts with the survey programme, a web-based Survey
Clash Detector tool has been developed. The tool simply
reports positional clashes for an instrument; it does not
attempt to say whether the clash constitutes a conflict between
your proposal and one of the surveys. If a clash is detected,
you will need to check the survey descriptions to determine if
there is a conflict.
Atmospheric Opacity Statistics
It's well known that summer months tend to be much wetter than
winter months, but on average, how much wetter is it? Just how
much time is generally available in certain weather bands at
certain times of the year? Click here for a discussion,
reprinted from the Spring 2007 issue of the JCMT
Newsletter, on atmospheric opacity statistics. For
example, in winter months (Dec-April) on average only about 10-15%
of the time is band 1, while in summertime the fraction is under
5%. About 15% of the time we encounter band 5 weather, and as much
again is lost entirely to bad weather.
Proposal Submission
The Northstar, web-based proposal submission and management system
was imported recently from ASTRON to JAC, and has
handled recent proposal rounds. Poor server access for a small number of
applicants in the initial rounds has been overcome;
we urge applicants experiencing problems in submission to contact us
as soon as possible.
All users are advised to
check and update
your accounts
as soon as Northstar becomes available for the 10B round.
As mentioned in our
Help page, you may, at first, have to accept the server certificate to
gain access to Northstar.
Except for the University of Hawaii, all proposals should be submitted
HERE.
If you have a Northstar account already you can
login using your username and password; new users should
register first.
Help regarding the submission process
is available
here - - -
and in our
Help pages !
To Which Queue Should You Send Your Application?:
Proposals should be submitted to the United Kingdom-, the Netherlands-,
the Canadian-, or the International- queue, depending on the
primary funding agency of the Principal Investigator (PI) or
Co-Investigators (CoIs):
- If the PI is employed by a UK, Netherlands or Canadian institution
then submit the proposal to the UK, Netherlands or Canadian queue
respectively.
- If the PI is not employed by a UK, Netherlands or Canadian institution,
but at least one of the Co-Is is employed by an institution from one
of these three countries, then submit the proposal to the
national queue of the first-named of those Co-Is.
- If neither the PI nor any of the Co-Is is employed by an
institution in the UK, the Netherlands,
or Canada, then the proposal must be submitted to the International
queue.
- Employees of the JAC are considered as 'International', unless
they are the PI.
- If you are in any doubt about where to submit, then please
e-mail Iain Coulson.
Proposals sent to the wrong queue risk being rejected, as do proposals
using font sizes smaller than those
prescribed.
Observer Status and Queue Observing:
Canadian & Netherlands Projects
Canadian and Dutch programs have been executed successfully
in recent years during dedicated observing blocks.
The observer during these blocks is usually associated with
one of the high-priority programs to be observed,
but is effectively running the entire Canadian/Dutch
queue in a flexible manner. Canadian and Dutch applicants should
anticipate the possibility that they may or may not be asked to be
an observer for their national queue.
UK Projects
On the other hand, UK programs are scheduled individually, but
only if the UK TAG has determined that an observer should be present.
The observer then primarily observes their own program if the weather
permits, and, secondarily, observes other programs from the UK
queue, including those for which no observer was deemed essential.
The determination of 'observer' status by the UK TAG is guided by
several factors including the complexity of the program, the
weather requirements, the time needed, and the priority awarded
the
program. Consider these examples:
- A high-priority, good-weather, complex program will most
likely require an observer from among the applicants to go to
Hawaii to observe the program, whereas
- a moderately-ranked, straight-forward program needing poorer
weather may be successfully observed during flexible observing
by the attendant JCMT TSS, and will not need an observer from
among the applicants to be in attendance.
- However, a short, straight-forward, high-priority program
requiring the very best (and rarest) weather may not attract
observer status on the grounds that the observer would be
unlikely to be in attendance when the weather was
suitable. Such a program could be observed as a priority when
the weather was suitably good.
- If the PI has a specific reason that observer status would be
required, those reasons should be listed in the "Scheduling
Preferences" section of the proposal.
Note also that the JCMT Scheduler may, after consultation with
the UKTAG Tech.Sec., change the UKTAG's observer/non-observer
status, if and when required by constraints on the schedule.
International Projects
Allocated programs from the International queue are, except in very
rare
circumstances, required to provide an observer to staff the
telescope during their scheduled time. Nevertheless, observing
programs remain in the queue and may be observed during other
international observing blocks, or during JCMT Legacy Survey
blocks (see above) when no suitable
JLS projects are available.
Flexible Scheduling
The overall philosophy of observing at JCMT is to match
observing programs to the weather; our
Flexible Observing Guidelines are recommended reading for
all visitors to JCMT observing in all queues (except Univ. of Hawaii).
RadioNet
support of European Applicants:
The JCMT is a member of the European Union's
RadioNet
consortium of European radio observatories.
Under the terms of this programme, eligible European observers at
JCMT may have their travel and subsistence costs reimbursed by
RadioNet.
The JCMT also receives a fee for the time spent
observing eligible projects, the proceeds of which are being used to
fund the development of SCUBA-2.
The primary
eligibility
criterion is that
the PI, and at least half of all the applicants, must be from an EU member
country (excluding NL and UK) or an EU associated state.
Proposals should be submitted to the appropriate queue following the rules
for all programs described
elsewhere
in this Call, and will be assessed by the appropriate TAG
alongside other proposals in that queue.
The PIs of successful,
RadioNet-eligible proposals
will be informed of the procedures for reimbursement.
For more information please
contact Iain Coulson.
The JCMT Users e-mail exploder:
From time to time, subscribers to the 'jcmt_users' email list will
receive notices on the status of the JCMT, call for proposals,
etc. To subscribe, please visit http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/jcmt_users
And Finally:
If you've read all this and still have questions about the
scheduling, the submission deadlines, the procedures, etc -
please contact me.
Iain Coulson
JCMT Scheduler
|