JCMT Newsletter No. 17 (SCUBA-2)
An update on SCUBA-2: the new wide-field imaging camera for the JCMT
Wayne Holland & William Duncan - ROE/ATC
SCUBA-2 is a new, wide-field submm camera planned to replace SCUBA(-1) on
the JCMT in 2005/6. The science goals and baseline design were described
in an
article
in the
Sept 2000 newsletter.
Considerable progress has been
made since then, and this article aims to provide an update on some of the
major developments that have taken place in the past year. Although the
SCUBA-2 project remains only partly funded, a very valuable contribution
of 4M UKP was recently awarded by the UK Office of Science and Technology
towards the total project costs (estimated to be 8.9M UKP).
1. Science Drivers and Baseline Design
The science drivers for SCUBA-2 are well-established, but for anyone not
familiar with the instrument, and as a way of an introduction, it's worth
re-emphasising the main science goals:
- Deep imaging. This is very time consuming with SCUBA - relying on
co-adding lots of frames of data over periods of many hours (especially
difficult at 450 microns, where it is rare to have extended periods of
good, stable weather). SCUBA-2 aims to reach the extragalactic confusion
limit at 850 microns in around 1-2 hrs, instead of ~50 hrs at the present
time.
- Maximise the survey potential. Even though SCUBA has been a big step
forward in terms of mapping large areas of sky, only an area about the
size of a full moon has been mapped to any great depth (near the confusion
limit). SCUBA-2 aims to map large areas of sky at least several hundred
times faster than SCUBA to the same S/N.
- Improve image fidelity and map dynamic range. SCUBA requires a minimum
of 128 secs to produce a fully-sampled map at both 450 and 850 microns. In
addition, because SCUBA can only record an AC signal (i.e. chopped signal)
we are constantly subtracting two images of the sky. SCUBA-2 will aim to
improve data quality by instantaneously sampling the sky, and operate in a
mode that avoids the necessity to sky chop.
- Imaging at two colours simultaneously. This has been successful with
SCUBA - for example, it allows meaningful studies of dust properties, as
well as utilizing periods of good weather to exploit the higher angular
resolution available at shorter wavelengths. SCUBA-2 aims to continue in
this mode.
- Act as a "pathfinder" for submm interferometers. By coming on-line in
2005/06 SCUBA-2 should have at least a few years of observations before
ALMA begins full operation. Wide-field surveys will be crucial to
fully-exploit the capabilities of the new generation interferometers.
The instrument challenge is therefore to take these science drivers
and incorporate new developments in detector technology to design the
first "Submm CCD Camera"! To achieve the science goals requires that the
instrument have:
- Per-pixel sensitivities to be dominated by the sky background photon
noise (fundamental limitation). This requires improvements of a factor of
three over the current SCUBA bolometers.
- The maximum (undistorted) field-of-view allowed by the telescope.
This turns out to be 64 sq-arcminutes (c.f. to only 4.3 sq-arcmins for
SCUBA) - a factor of 16 times larger field.
- Fully-sampled imaged planes and DC-coupled electronics (no sky chopping)
to improve image fidelity and map dynamic range. This requires 25,600 and
6,400 pixels at 450 and 850 microns, and ultra stable electronics at low
(DC) frequencies.
- A dichroic beamsplitter to split the short-wave and long-wave channels
onto two separate arrays. Thus, simultaneous observing will be available
with two colours.
2. Array Development
2.1 Superconducting detector development
Conventional bolometer technology (such as that used in SCUBA) is not
practical for the pixel count required for SCUBA-2. The SCUBA-2 arrays
will utilise superconducting Transition Edge Sensors (TES), with the
signals read-out using time-division SQUID multiplexers. The array
development is being led by the National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) in Boulder, and the Scottish Microelectronics Centre
(SMC) in Edinburgh. Earlier this year research agreements were signed with
both NIST and SMC to produce prototype and science-grade arrays for
SCUBA-2. An "Array Technology Meeting" was subsequently held in Boulder
which led to the baseline design for a single-pixel and initial concepts
for an array structure.
2.2 Pixel and array design
Several crucial decisions were made at the Boulder meeting. Figure 1 shows
a schematic drawing of the novel SCUBA-2 pixel design, together with a
concept for the array geometry. The design consists of an upper detector
chip and a lower multiplexer (MUX) chip, which are held together with
indium bump bonds. The detector chip consists of two silicon wafers
diffusion bonded together, with the top wafer having micro-machined square
wells to provide support for the array. The upper surface of the bottom
wafer forms the radiation absorber, and is ion-implanted to give a surface
impedance match to free space. The backshort for the absorber is formed by
the TES device itself, which covers the entire underside of the pixel, and
is a one-quarter wavelength distant from the absorber. This integral
backshort design greatly simplifies the construction of the array.
Electro-magnetic modeling of the pixel and array geometry shows that the
absorption efficiency is likely to be at least 90%.
FIGURE 1: (a) Single pixel schematic diagram (b) Concept of the array
architecture design
2.3 Multiplexer design
The hybrid detector design means that each pixel has a SQUID amplifier and
coupling transformer directly underneath on the MUX chip. The MUX design
is critical in that it has to minimise signal crosstalk due to magnetic
coupling between adjacent pixels. The maximum area available for the MUX
is therefore limited by the size of the pixel (~1mm and 0.5mm at 850 and
450 microns). At 450 microns there is simply not enough space for all the
coupling inductors in the low-crosstalk design. Rather than undergo an
extensive re-development programme for a separate 450 micron MUX, it was
decided to make the 450 micron pixel size the same as the 850, with the
consequence that the 450 array would now have 6400 pixels and be
instantaneously undersampled by a factor of 2 (pixels spaced by F-lambda
in the focal plane).
Although this sounds like a step backwards, the scientific consequences
are not that great. The large-area mapping speed is reduced by a factor of
2, a micro-step pattern will be needed to produce a fully-sampled map
(only a 4-point jiggle is needed), and the beam size on the sky for each
pixel is about 14% broader. Given the alternatives (a complex and lengthy
re-development MUX programme) these losses were considered to be
acceptable to minimise further risk in the array development. In fact,
there are also some advantages such as the pixels at both wavelengths
having the same physical size (making fabrication techniques inherently
simpler), and fewer channels of detectors (making the electronics simpler
and cheaper).
2.4 Focal plane layout
The optical design (see below) and the necessity to have the pixels at
least a wavelength in size means that each focal plane will be
approximately 90mm in diameter. Silicon micro-machining at the SMC is
confined to industry standard 3-inch wafers. Hence, a focal plane layout
has been adopted that consists of 4 separate sub-arrays at each
wavelength. Each sub-array will have 40 x 40 pixels, and will be butted
together as shown in Figure 2.
FIGURE 2: Array focal plane layout showing the 4 sub-arrays butted
together.
2.5 Progress to date
Since the Array Technology Meeting in February, work has concentrated on
the design and manufacture of single TES pixels and linear multiplexers,
as well as developing the techniques needed to construct large-format
arrays. The single-pixel design, as mentioned above, is largely complete
and NIST are now starting to produce test single-pixels with the desired
thermal and electrical properties. Crucially, this means that the pixels
must have the correct noise equivalent power and time response to meet the
science goals. Some problems with the Mo and Cu guns in the plasma
deposition system have prevented the production of test TES pixels until
now. These have been resolved and the programme can now re-commence. This
will start with the fabrication of some x-ray pixels to show that earlier
designs can be reproduced.
The MUX manufacture is already ahead of schedule with a 1 x 32 prototype
already undergoing cold dip testing. The initial results, stepping through
the addressing very slowly look very encouraging. A 4 K dip probe is being
developed to allow testing at the full MUX addressing rates. Testing
should commence at the end of September. Figure 3 shows the overall system
read-out scheme, highlighting some of the components that will be
incorporated.
FIGURE 3: SCUBA-2 signal readout scheme showing photographs of some
of the components.
A considerable amount of work has also been carried out at SMC on
developing and testing array manufacture techniques. Implanted wafers
have already been made and have demonstrated excellent absorption
efficiency in tests at Cardiff University. The SMC is also investigating
the best way to manufacture the silicon backshort and sourcing vendors for
the bump-bonding process.
3. Instrument Design
3.1 Optics design
In parallel with the array development, work is proceeding at a healthy
rate on the instrument design at the ATC. The optics design is a crucial
part of this, as it has a significant bearing on the size of the focal
plane, the size and shape of the cryostat needed, and the location of the
instrument on the telescope.
There are complex trade-offs in the design involving minimising the field
distortion and maximising the Strehl ratio over an 8 arcminute field, as
well as ensuring that the focal plane is a manageable size. Optimisation
of the design using Zeemax allows for the final optics to be f/2.7,
accommodating individual pixels sizes of ~1mm and a array diameter of some
90mm. However, at the tertiary mirror of the telescope, the re-imaged
field is some 600mm in diameter, and so SCUBA-2 requires a complex set of
optics using large mirrors with complex shapes to re-image the field onto
the detector array with maximum efficiency and minimum distortion.
Another important aspect of the optical design is minimising any stray
light from reaching the arrays that can potentially degrade sensitivity.
This is particularly important for SCUBA-2 since the detectors have no
feedhorns to define their field-of-view (they have an approximate PI
steradian f-o-v). In the SCUBA-2 design the field-of-view is controlled by
a cold stop some 300mm in front of the array, and it is therefore vital
that a high quality pupil image be attainable at this point in the optics.
Other complexities involve how the images will "sheer" as the telescope
moves in elevation, and flexure issues concerned with how the mirrors are
mounted.
Taking all these issues into account, we are currently considering
locating SCUBA-2 on the antenna floor - underneath the Nasymth platform,
but still attached to the telescope A-frame. An initial concept for this
is shown in Figure 4. The main advantages of this are that it becomes much
easier to control the quality of the cold-stop pupil image (the current
design shows this to be the excellent), puts the instrument in an area
that has more space around for electronics, and potentially allows much
easier access for future add-on instruments (such as a polarimeter or an
FT/grating/F-P spectrometer). Optimisation of this design is currently
underway.
FIGURE 4: (a) Possible location for SCUBA-2 on the telescope.
3.2 Systems analysis: operational modes
Work is also ongoing in defining just how we will observe with SCUBA-2 on
the telescope. Carrying out this work up-front is crucial, as it will
likely impact on the opto-mechanical design. The two basic observing modes
will be STARE-MAP - it's simplest form being a "point-and-shoot" mode for
sources comparable in size or smaller than the field-of-view, and SCAN-MAP
- rastering the telescope across an extended source that is larger then
the f-o-v. It is likely that each of these basic modes will have several
configurations depending on the source morphology and how deep an
integration time is required. One of the fundamental differences between
SCUBA-2 and SCUBA is how the (dominant) background emission is determined
and subtracted. Instead of sky chopping, which increases the confusion
limit and limits the visible source-size scales, it will be up to the
astronomer to decide just where the sky background is.
An example of how the systems analysis work has an impact on the
instrument design is that a cold dark shutter is being designed into the
instrument to allow "dark frames" to be taken. The frequency of the dark
measurements depends critically on the low-frequency (DC) stability of the
detectors and electronics. Other crucial areas include how to deal with
variations in detector responsivity (which is very dependent on the sky
background) and also how to cope with atmospheric sky-noise. We are
currently developing various simulation tools to assist in determining how
best to use the instrument, given atmospheric instabilities and variations
in detector response. This work is being carried out with the assistance
of Rudolf Le Poole (Leiden) and Hans von Someron Greve (ASTRON) and also
David Hughes and Ed Chapin (INAOE).
3.3 Cryo-mechanical design
The cryo-mechanical design is challenging! Two 250 x 250mm focal plane
structures must be integrated into a cryostat and cooled to ~60mk. This
structure is thermally coupled to a dilution refrigerator and has a 1K
optics box to minimise stray light. This box will also act as a magnetic
field shield for the SQUID amplifiers. Initial concepts are being
considered in more detail. One novel feature is the possible use of a 4K
"pulse tube cooler" to enable a cryo-free dilution refrigerator to be
used. This would save a great deal of time and effort (and consequently
money...) during both the lab testing phase and operation on the
telescope.
4. The road to SCUBA-2
The timeliness of the delivery of SCUBA-2 to the JCMT is critical. For the
telescope to remain competitive, in the era leading to new facilities
(such as the 50-m LMT in Mexico, the Herschel satellite, and the ALMA
interferometer), it is vital that SCUBA-2 be delivered by 2006. Figure 5
highlights some of the current and upcoming facilities that are/will be
available for submm astronomy over the next decade. The current plans for
SCUBA-2 are to deliver to the telescope before the end of 2005 with one
sub-array at each wavelength (i.e. 1600 pixels at 450 and 850 microns).
This will give the community as early access to the instrument as
possible. Since the production and testing of science-grade sub-arrays
will take some time in any case (due largely to limited production line
facilities), it has been agreed that a phased delivery of instrument
capabilities is the best approach.
FIGURE 5: The road to SCUBA-2 (and beyond...)
5. Project consortium
The SCUBA-2 Project Consortium is now well established. The overall
management of the project, as well as the instrument design, construction,
testing and commissioning, are the responsibility of the UK-ATC. NIST are
responsible for the TES detectors and SQUID MUX manufacture. Working
closely with them will be the SMC, who will carry out the silicon
micro-machining of the detector and support structures, and with a
specialist company, develop the superconducting bump-bond process for the
detector and multiplexer wafers. The Astronomy Instrumentation Group at
Cardiff University will test single pixels and prototype electronics,
manufacture the filters and dichroic, and participate in the array test
and evaluation programme. The Joint Astronomy Centre will be involved in
the commissioning of the instrument, and will be largely responsible for
infrastructure requirements at the telescope.
6. Current milestones
The most critical milestone that SCUBA-2 faces is proving that the
proposed array technology will actually work! Hence, there is a major
project milestone in October 2002, when it must be proven that a small
prototype array (which could be as big as 32 x 32 elements) can be
produced. This must prove issues such as detector yield and mechanical
robustness, as well as demonstrating thermal, electrical and optical
properties close to that designed. In summary, the other major project
milestones are as follows:
| o Optical design PDR | October 2001 |
| o Systems PDR | February 2002 |
| o Array technology CDR | October 2002 |
| o Full prototype (40x40) sub-array | June 2003 |
| o First science-grade 850 sub-array | April 2004 |
| o First science-grade 450 sub-array | November 2004 |
| o Phase I delivery (2 sub-arrays) | October 2005 |
| o Upgrade to full sub-array complement | October 2006 |
7. Conclusions
SCUBA-2 represents a major departure from existing submm continuum
instruments. Incorporating state-of-the-art technology will allow the
realisation of the first large-format "CCD-like" camera for submm
astronomy. The science applications for such an instrument are
tremendously exciting and very broad-based, ranging from the study of
Solar System objects to probing galaxy formation in the early Universe.
SCUBA-2 will map large-areas of sky many hundreds of times faster than the
current SCUBA. The improved sensitivity and imaging power will allow the
JCMT to really exploit periods of excellent weather on Mauna Kea.
Undertaking wide-field surveys with SCUBA-2 are vital to fully exploit the
capabilities of the new generation submm interferometers. Finally, the new
technology has applications beyond SCUBA-2 (optical photon counters, x-ray
spectrometers, arrays in space or on even larger telescopes) and thus
represents a major strategic investment on behalf of the JCMT funding
agencies.
More information can be found on the SCUBA-2 Homepage:
http://www.roe.ac.uk/atc/projects
Acknowledgements:
The SCUBA-2 Project Team consists of:
ATC: William Duncan (Project Director), Wayne Holland (Project Scientist),
Trevor Hodson (interim Project Manager), Damian Audley (Instrument
Scientist), Dennis Kelly (Systems Analysis and Software Design), Tully
Peacocke (Optical Design Engineer), Peter Hastings (Mechanical Design
Engineer), Mike MacIntosh (Electronics Engineer), Vicki Ramsay (Project
Support)
NIST: Kent Irwin (Project Manager and TES Design), Gene Hilton (MUX
Design), Steve Deiker (TES Manufacture and Testing)
SMC: Anthony Walton (Head of Group), Alan Gundlach (Project Manager),
William Parkes (Design Engineer: bump bonding), Camilla Dunare (Design
Engineer: ion implantation and wafer bonding)
Cardiff Univ: Peter Ade (Project Manager)
Joint Astronomy Centre: Ian Robson (Director), Dean Shutt (Chief
Engineer), Tomas Chylek (Mechanical Design Engineer)
back to:> September 2001 Newsletter Index
Gerald Moriarty-Schieven
|