SCUBA observations of the host galaxies of four dark gamma-ray bursts
SCUBA observations of the host galaxies of four dark gamma-ray bursts
Vicki Barnard
Joint Astronomy Centre
Andrew Blain
CalTech
Nial Tanvir
University of Hertfordshire
Priya Natarajan
Yale University
& Ian Smith
Rice University
(This article is based on the work published in Barnard et al., 2003, MNRAS 338, 1-6. Please see this paper for citations of work referred to below.)
Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are the focus of much current astronomy
research and yet many questions remain unanswered about these
hugely energetic phenomena. Whilst it is now clear that the GRB
population is extragalactic, the actual cause and progenitors of
these massive explosions are not yet certain. Most models
currently involve the endpoints in the evolution of massive
stars, and so the host galaxies of GRBs are expected to have
high star-formation rates. These ideas are supported by studies
of the relative rates of star formation and GRB explosions in
the Universe as a whole, which suggest a strong correlation.
Radiation from the site of GRBs comes in three major phases: the
initial explosion, during which the GRB may be the most luminous
object in the Universe; followed by the afterglow as an
ultrarelativistic shock wave passes through the surrounding ISM;
followed eventually by emission from the host galaxy of the GRB
progenitor. The recent increase in GRB research was sparked by
the detection of the first afterglow (GRB 970508), essentially
because the afterglow is relatively long-lasting and passes
through a range of wavelengths, which allows far better
positional accuracy than the glimpses of brief high-energy
initial explosion radiation.
Afterglows from GRBs have now been observed at nearly all
wavelengths, and the information garnered by following the
evolution of a GRB's afterglow has led to the general acceptance
of the synchrotron fireball model. Details such as polarisation
and collimation of afterglows are now the focus of research.
However, there is a large fraction of GRBs for which, despite rapid
and deep searches, optical afterglows were not found. This
fraction is around 50 per cent and so these 'dark' GRBs may
represent an important population. It is not clear however
whether these GRBs are intrinsically different objects to those
with optically bright afterglows, or whether their optical
faintness depends on their surroundings. Several authors have
suggested that the apparent optical faintness of these GRBs may
be due to obscuring dust along the line of sight. Since the
energy of the shock wave is expected to clear out dust in the
GRB's vicinity, this explanation would require the GRBs to be
located in generally dusty galaxies. This, in combination with
the expected high star-formation rates of GRB host galaxies,
makes them a target for SCUBA observations.
We observed a small sample of optically dark GRBs (with good
positions from radio and/or X-ray afterglows) with SCUBA in
photometry mode. Four host galaxies were observed. Of these,
only one appears to represent a possible detection, and this has
been confirmed by combining our result with that of another
group (see Berger et al., astro-ph/0210645, and the March 2002
article). Overall, we find
that the 'dark' GRB host galaxy population is no more likely to
be dusty than the general galaxy population. This is
illustrated in figure 1, where the results of our sample are
compared with two galaxy evolution models (marked BSIK and
BJSLKI) which represent the SCUBA galaxy population. In this
figure, the fraction of hosts with 850µm flux density
greater than the value S is plotted. The smooth curves
correspond to the two models, whilst the solid stepped line
shows the cumulative results from our sample (and the dotted
lines represent 1 sigma errors).
This result indicates that to characterise the optically dark GRB
population as residing in dusty host galaxies is incorrect; in
fact a variety of explanations probably need to be applied to
the whole population. This is further reinforced by the
findings of other researchers that some GRB hosts are bright in
the submillimetre even when the optical afterglow was observed.
Hence the optical afterglow of a GRB is not a reliable guide to
the submillimetre luminosity of the host galaxy. We are
currently completing a wider survey of all GRBs, to further
understand the links between the GRB host galaxy population and
the SCUBA galaxy population.
back to:> Printable Newsletter Index
back to:> Newsletter Index
Vicki Barnard
|