ACSIS Information
August 29, 2008
Current Status
ACSIS is available
for use with HARP and other
receivers. The system - ACSIS/receivers/OCS - is still very much being
worked on e.g. fixing outstanding problems such as total
power
spikes, measuring and implementing K-mirror pointing offsets, measuring
and implementing actual pixel positions,
improving calibration, baselines and adding observing modes.
In particular multi subsystem modes have been added. Note that
frequency switching has not yet been implemented. Time permitting
frequency
switching will be debugged during 2008 - this assumes that
some of the other issues are solved and that SCUBA2 not will consume to
much effort.
Available Bandwidth Modes
HARP
ACSIS has in total 32 down converter modules
(DCMs) and correlator cards. A DCM "picks out" a 250 or 1000MHz
wide subband from an IF input and feeds the signal to a correlator card.
HARP only has 16 IF outputs while there are 32
DCMs and correlator cards. The "excess" of DCMs and correlator
cards can be used in two
ways.
- Chaining two correlator cards together doubling
the number of channels in a 250 or 1000MHz subband. Only 16 DCMs are
used in this case.
- Use two DCMs to
extract two frequency subbands from each of the 16 IF inputs and feed
each subband to a correlator card. This creates two spectral windows or
spectral regions to follow the OT terminology. All 32 DCMS are used in
this case.
- The OT support a
special case of option two - by selecting a single spectral region with
440MHz or 1860MHz bandwidth the OT automatically set up two subbands
that overlaps slightly.
These bands can be merged later in the data reduction (it will also be
done by the pipeline in the future). Note: the merging used to done by
the ACSIS DR system - for further details see footnote*. When using 440
or 1860MHz bandwidth you might be better of not centering the line in
the wide band - since that places the line in the overlap region.
New options are the 1600 and 1800MHz bandwidths, which have larger overlap
between the 2 subbands (but the same spectral resolution) than the 1860MHz
bandwidth. This is useful when the spectra contain very broad lines. Likewise
there are 400 and 420MHz bandwidths available.
An
example of the
second use is to observe 13CO
3-2 and C18O 3-2 using two spectral regions (subbands). A number of
such setups are pre-prepared and can
be
selected as "spectral configurations" in the OT. The spectral window
and bandwidth possibilities for HARP are summarized in the table below.
An
example of the third option is to select 1860MHz mode for a wide extra
galactic source. It this case it is less error prone to let the OT do
the setup than "manually" do the setup using the frequency editor.
Further, it has the advantage that both spectral regions use the same
rest frequency.
Spectral
windows
|
BW mode
|
Channel
Spacing
|
Usable
Bandwidth
|
1
|
250
|
30.5kHz
|
~220MHz
|
1000
|
0.488MHz
|
~930MHz
|
1860 (1600,1800)
|
0.977MHz |
~1860(1600,1800)MHz
|
440 (400,420)
|
61.0kHz
|
~440(400,420)MHz
|
2
|
any 250
|
61.0kHz |
~220MHz
|
any 1000
|
0.977MHz |
~930MHz
|
Table 1: HARP BW modes
E.g. if two spectral windows are selected in the OT one
with a bandwidth of
250MHz and the other with a bandwidth of 1000MHz, the result is one
spectrum of usable bandwidth ~220MHz and channel separation 61.0kHz and
one
spectrum
with usable bandwidth ~930MHz and channel separation 0.977MHz. Also not
that if
the
1860 or 440MHz option is selected only one spectral window is allowed -
the
32 DCMs and correlator cards has already been used up! As can be seen from channel spacing in the table the 1860
and
440MHz mode are using 2 subbands. Conversely,
if
you select 2 subbands only the bandwidth options 250 and 1000MHz
exists.
RxA & RxW
RxA or RxW are not
able to use all the DCMs and
correlator boards in ACSIS - see the HARP section. A maximum of 4
DCMs/correlators can be
feed from the same IF in a usable way. Thus,
you can select 1-4 spectral windows for each IF output from
RxA or RxW with the BW mode summarized in the table below.
|
Spectral windows
|
BW mode
|
Channel
Spacing
|
Usable
Bandwidth
|
1-2
|
any 250MHz
band
|
30.5kHz
|
~220MHz
|
any 1000MHz
band
|
0.488MHz
|
~930MHz
|
any
440MHz band
|
61.0kHz |
~440MHz
|
any
1860MHz band
|
0.977MHz |
~1860MHz
|
3
|
A spectral window as in one of the
four rows above |
|
|
any other 250
MHz band
|
61.0kHz |
~220MHz
|
any other
1000MHz band
|
0.977MHz
|
~930MHz
|
|
4
|
any 250 MHz
band |
61.0kHz
|
~220MHz
|
| any 1000MHz
band |
0.977MHz |
~930MHz |
Table
2: RxA & RxW bandwidth modes
Note that it is
possible to configure ACSIS with four 250MHz subbands with the centers
separated by 220MHz to generate a ~880MHz wide spectrum. Non of the current frontends has an IF bandwidth large
enough to make it fruitful to implement the analog setup using 1000MHz
subbands - the OT will not allow you anyway. Another
possibility is to combined 3 250MHz subband to a ~660MHz spectral
window and a separate 250/1000MHz spectral window. These possibilities
are
not explicitly supported by the OT or covered in table 2.
For the curious - with 3 spectral window and 4 DCMs/correlator cards
the DCMs/correlator cards can only be distributed 1+1+2 over the three
spectral windows. The
spectral window with 2 DCMs/correlator cards can support higher
resolution or higher
bandwidth.
* The merging in the ACSIS DR occasionally created artificial features
where the spectra were joined. The reason were to small overlaps and
that the merge was weighted by the total power drop off. In principle
Tsys weighting would be better but the estimated Tsys also get very
uncertain at the edge. Further, merging the spectra was an irreversible
process. Thus, if there was a problem we could not go back and
reprocess the data. Of these reasons we do now store the unmerged raw
spectra and the merging is done in the post processing.