Bad weather cut-off?
Bad Weather Cutoff?
Henry Matthews, Remo Tilanus
The plot below shows the system temperatures of RxA3 observations
since 08/01/1998 as a function of CSO Tau.
Apart from the tuning, two main factors that determine the shape of
scatter diagram are the CSO Tau and the Elevation of the observations.
The lower curve shows an 'eye-ball' to what we can call the zenith
behaviour. The linear line shows an 'eye-ball' dependency for the
'average' observation. Remarkably, the line shows some evidence of
intelligence on part of some observers to stay at higher elevations
when the weather gets worse, at least for taus up to about
0.36. Beyond that a 'the-devil-may-care' attitude appears to take
over.
Anyway, based on the these lines we can make the following table:
Tau 225 Ghz | | Tsys Zenith | Obs. Time |
| Tsys Average | Obs. Time |
| 0.1 | | 275 | .75 |
| 320 | .64 |
| 0.15 | | 320 | 1.0 |
| 400 | 1.0 |
| 0.2 | | 360 | 1.3 |
| 480 | 1.4 |
| 0.25 | | 450 | 2.0 |
| 560 | 2.0 |
| 0.3 | | 500 | 2.4 |
| 640 | 2.6 |
| 0.35 | | 600 | 3.5 |
| 720 | 3.2 |
| 0.4 | | 700 | 4.8 |
| 800 | 4.0 |
Except at the two extremes the observing times listed are in
reasonably good agreement. A number of conclusions:
- At tau = 0.25 an observer will need two times the integration time at
tau = 0.15
and more than 2.5 times the integration time at tau = 0.1.
- Somewhere around tau=0.32 the required integration time becomes 3
times longer
than at 0.15 and 2 times longer than at tau = 0.2.
- Smart observers who restrict their observations to the higher
elevations at tau = 0.4
will still need 3 to 4 times the integration
time at tau = 0.15.
Where to draw the line? Obviously, for prime programs it may well be
worth it to be observing in tau = 0.4 weather and to take the factor
of 3 or 4 penalty. However, for BACKUP projects 0.32 seems like a good
cutoff when the integration time starts exceeding the one you can get
in reasonable RxA3 conditions by a factor of ~2.5. However, under
these conditions the atmosphere is likely not to be very stable and
the instantaneous pointing and focus are probably going to be very
marginal, a factor which has to be taken into consideration when
selecting suitable projects.
The plot shows the system temperatures of RxA3 observations as a
function of CSO Tau. Selection criteria: Tsys of the center DAS band
(unless only one) for observations since 08/01/1998 and below 240 GHz
and a Trx between 50 and 150 K.
|