Joint Astronomy Centre
Show document only
JAC Home
JCMT
UKIRT
Contact info
JAC Divisions
OMP
Outreach
Seminars
Staff-only Wiki
Weather
Web Cameras
____________________

JCMT home
Observing at JCMT
OMP Observation Manager
Telescope
Spectral Line Observing
Continuum Observing
Schedule
Data Archive
Future Developments
Legacy Surveys
Newsletter & Publications
Bad weather cut-off?
Bad Weather Cutoff?
Henry Matthews, Remo Tilanus

The plot below shows the system temperatures of RxA3 observations since 08/01/1998 as a function of CSO Tau.

Apart from the tuning, two main factors that determine the shape of scatter diagram are the CSO Tau and the Elevation of the observations. The lower curve shows an 'eye-ball' to what we can call the zenith behaviour. The linear line shows an 'eye-ball' dependency for the 'average' observation. Remarkably, the line shows some evidence of intelligence on part of some observers to stay at higher elevations when the weather gets worse, at least for taus up to about 0.36. Beyond that a 'the-devil-may-care' attitude appears to take over.

Anyway, based on the these lines we can make the following table:

Tau
225 Ghz
 Tsys
Zenith
Obs.
Time
 Tsys
Average
Obs.
Time
0.1   275 .75   320 .64
0.15   320 1.0   400 1.0
0.2   360 1.3   480 1.4
0.25   450 2.0   560 2.0
0.3   500 2.4   640 2.6
0.35   600 3.5   720 3.2
0.4   700 4.8   800 4.0

Except at the two extremes the observing times listed are in reasonably good agreement. A number of conclusions:

  1. At tau = 0.25 an observer will need two times the integration time at tau = 0.15
    and more than 2.5 times the integration time at tau = 0.1.
  2. Somewhere around tau=0.32 the required integration time becomes 3 times longer
    than at 0.15 and 2 times longer than at tau = 0.2.
  3. Smart observers who restrict their observations to the higher elevations at tau = 0.4
    will still need 3 to 4 times the integration time at tau = 0.15.

Where to draw the line? Obviously, for prime programs it may well be worth it to be observing in tau = 0.4 weather and to take the factor of 3 or 4 penalty. However, for BACKUP projects 0.32 seems like a good cutoff when the integration time starts exceeding the one you can get in reasonable RxA3 conditions by a factor of ~2.5. However, under these conditions the atmosphere is likely not to be very stable and the instantaneous pointing and focus are probably going to be very marginal, a factor which has to be taken into consideration when selecting suitable projects.

Tsys versus Tau plot
The plot shows the system temperatures of RxA3 observations as a function of CSO Tau. Selection criteria: Tsys of the center DAS band (unless only one) for observations since 08/01/1998 and below 240 GHz and a Trx between 50 and 150 K.

Contact: Jan Wouterloot. Updated: Thu Dec 30 14:00:11 HST 2004

Return to top ^