20000825 report
Transit tracking & all-sky pointing with the new TCS
SUMMARY
Further tests of the 's-correction' and some all-sky pointing were
done over the past two nights with the new TCS.
-
The new data show again that the step is not symmetric about azimuth
180 degrees, in stark contrast to the
discovery data.
-
The empirical correction is being added with the wrong sign within the
new TCS.
-
All-sky pointing allowed a new
TPOINT
model to be generated.
Transit Tracking
The 'transit' problem was noticed first in
April . A correction was
installed on 16 May, but recent checks in
May,
June and
twice in
July
have been inconclusive for various reasons.
The latest tests were done during the last stages of
commissioning of the new TCS (Telescope Control System). Conditions of
moderate transparency (taucso=0.10) prevailed.
Uranus was tracked for about 2 hours on consecutive evenings, using the
SCUBA map16 method; the first time
with the EMPIRICAL correction de-activated, the second with it activated :
Transit occurred at elevation 54 degrees.
The raw residuals are (1.3",1.4") in (daz,del) on the first night when
the seeing was 0.5", and (0.9",2.7") on the second, when the seeing was
0.8". The del residuals clearly show the 4" step in the first
dataset, although the step is not symmetric about azimuth 180 degrees,
as was the case during the
discovery data.
Similar 'transit-asymmetric' residuals were noted in the
previous runs,
although these new data suggest a symmetry point only 1 or 2 degrees
from 180 rather than the several degrees seen previously.
The second night's data appear to have added the empirical corrections
in with the wrong sign : the step ought to have been reduced to zero, but
appears instead to have doubled in amplitude.
All-sky pointing
19 data were collected before the first of the transit experiments above.
The raw residuals are shown below :
The data show systematic errors in the daz-vs-az and del-vs-az plots
indicative of errors in the values of the
parameters describing the
deviations of the azimuth axis from the vertical.
The data were run through
TPOINT
and the raw residuals of (3.4",3.3") are reduced to a vector error of 2.3"
after the following changes to the TPOINT parameters :
Parameter AN AW NPAE CA IA IE TF
Suggested change 3.1 -2.0 -1.6 -1.0 0.2 11.6 9.8
+- 0.6 0.7 2.2 0.3 2.2 3.2 4.5
New value 11.3 -18.2 104.6 -222.9 31.8 77.1 -7.4
It is noteworthy that
TPOINT
did better at providing a controlled solution for these data than
FIT9, which, as often happens, allows
parameters 3,4,5 (NPAE, CA, IA) to change by self-consistent but
excessively large amounts.
TPOINT is to be used exclusively once the new TCS is adopted.
Conclusions
- The new transit tracking data suggest that the s-correction is
once again a fair approximation to the form of the elevation error,
although the characteristics of the error appear to have varied
since the discovery in April, principally in the azimuth of symmetry.
- Several of us (WSH, PF, ENA, NEJ, IMC) met Friday afternoon and
suggested that the next tracking data be taken using RxA and the
repetitive fives
routine. This will eliminate SCUBA, residual clock errors and my
customized reduction script from the process.
- The adjustments to the TPOINT
model were made during the afternoon 25 Aug 2000.
Iain Coulson
25 Aug 2000
|