20010619 report
Installation of algorithm to correct 'transit tracking' errors
Summary
Recently, large elevation errors were seen as a function of azimuth.
They most likely suggest a ~1s error in the clock. This was addressed
during the early part of the shift. New software was tested that should
correct the elevation pointing problems most easily seen during transit.
A sign convention error was detected and corrected. Subsequent allsky
pointing suggested that the pointing was good (1.5" rms in elevation),
although a confirmatory transit tracking measurement is still needed.
Poor pointing was reported during UT 20010617/8/9.
Adding these data together it was clear that the elevation
pointing was a very strong function of azimuth : see below left.
TPOINT solutions indicated either a clock error, IH, of
+10" (i.e about 2/3 of a second, above right) or a similar error
in AW (the main axis tip, E-W : hopefully nothing this drastic could have
happened; the corresponding
corrected data are similar to those above right).
Data from UT 20010613 might have suffered similarly, while those
of 20010527 do not. In between times there is insufficient data
to judge when the problem may have started.
UT 20010620
Nick Rees examined the clock
and discovered a frequency error.
The IRIG-B clock signal is not reaching the antenna servo micro (ASM) and
the ASM has probably been free-running for a while. Nick's estimate of the
error is about 1 second, which correlates well with the pointing data
above. The clock signal looks the same entering the ASM as leaving the
clock, so the problem seems to lie in the ASM or its boards.
Nick reset the ASM, and it synched OK to the clock,
but still now generates/shows a time offset error and a frequency
offset error. This will probably allow the ASM to keep time well enough
for a night while free-running internally, but needs a longer term
solution. Nick fetches the clock board from UKIRT, but upon return the
offset errors have gone !
Initial pointings indicate no major impact of the corrected leap-second
count. Various SCUBA observing mode tests were done. A transit tracking
was done on g343.0 using the new algorithm described on
20010523. The resulting data are
shown below :
The large change (~12") in the elevation residual is nearly double
that previously seen at this el*evation, implying a probable sign error
in the algorithm. The parameter SCURVE.AMP held in
(/net/ieie)/jac_sw/itsroot/src/tcs/thi/THI.tide was negated (now -4").
It would have been nice to repeat the transit tracking but no suitable
sources were available and the repeat will be requested from future EAC
shifts. Meanwhile some allsky pointing was performed :
Given the seeing during most of this was ~1" the rmss of (2.0",2.1")
seem quite acceptable.
Iain Coulson
Latest Update : 24 Jan 2002
|