|
20020210 report
New inclinometry data and pointing model tweak.
Poor weather allowed us to gather a regular CW run on 08 Feb :
Datasets El Dirn HST mean leg temperatures Humidity
start start middle end %
( 20020125 90 cw 06:05 -0.8 -0.5 -0.3 65 )
20020208 90 cw 22:55 -3.5 -3.5 -3.4 90
-
The new data at are again of full amplitude - i.e. showing
no sign of the 'small-amplitude' syndrome captured on
17 Oct.
-
The difference between the model resulting from the new data
and those from
25 Jan
is shown below :
-
The formal differences in
(F1,F2,F3)
between these data
are described by the rms scatters of
(1.08", 0.48", 0.63")
c.f.
(0.50", 0.51", 0.65")
previously.
The larger-than-normal difference (in F1) is probably due to the fairly
cold temperatures prevailing.
-
The new model was installed at 11:50 HST 11 Feb 2002.
-
The data were also analysed for symmetry
properties -- the time line shows all is OK.
-
. . . and the Strain Gauge measures
are added to the
record - all seems OK,
although, as with symmetry, the impact of the very low
temperatures may be detected in these new data.
All-sky Pointing UT 20020210
44 points SCUBA pointing results were logged, a majority
in the period 02:00-05:00 HST. They are shown below :
Residuals had rms's of (2.7",2.6")
but there were 5 odd data which I felt justified in removing,
to give a rather nice (1.6", 1.9") from the remaining 39 data.
These 5 were
- g343.0 at el=11degs : possibly useful for determining
TF or tweaking the refraction algorithm, but only in conjunction with
other low-el data (next lowest was ~25degs).
- 1656+477 at el=30 : v.weak to the point of vanishing : the array
noise
seemed stronger, and I worry about centroid determinations under
such circumstances.
- 3 data taken above el=77 (0529+075, 0529+075, 1116+128, all in the
south). These sit ~8" from the mean of the others in azimuth, in the
sense that the telescope was shooting behind the source. I am worried
that this is tracking problem, but this would need confirmation by
similar observations of northern sources.
From the remaining 39 I was able to tweak the model a little and
installed it on Sunday afternoon (10 Feb). The performance Sunday night
was not bad but not spectacular : (2.1",2.2"), with peculiar systematics
in time : elevation pointing becoming very -ve around midnight
and very +ve after 06:00. The seeing wasn't that bad, so I have
no good explanation for these oddities at this time.
Iain Coulson
Latest Update : 11 Feb 2002
|