|
20030102 report
SCUBA azimuth pointing residuals since 1997 - updated
On 16 April 2002 I said :
I have expressed concern recently over the generally
poor quality of the pointing as described by the rms residuals
in any data set -- see the minutes of any JCMT Operations meeting from
the last couple of months.
My feeling is that our advertised performance of 1.5" rms in each
coordinate is not being achieved at the telescope, and that
'recently' the figure has been more like 2.0" or more. I have therefore
plotted below the rms residuals for all SCUBA datasets with more
than 10 logged pointing data since 1997, expecting to find some
deterioration in pointing quality in recent times :
My feelings are the same today, and I have merely updated the plot
of that document below and I retain the ensuing discussion for
completeness :
I have displayed the plot here rather small so as to not
lead your eye -- and you may click on it for a full view --
but maybe not yet !
The plot shows the rms of the azimuth pointing residuals in each
dataset -vs- time (date) in the upper part of
the plot, and the elevation rms -vs- time in the lower part.
The azimuth data show, I think, a general reduction and tightening of
residuals at about the half-way point in this diagram, but then
abruptly exhibit
a qualitative deterioration about 2/3 of the way through the plot.
This is mid-late August 2000, identified on the plot by a red line.
This coincides precisely with the introduction of the 'new' (at that time)
TCS.
There is no corresponding change in the elevation residuals.
It was at first somewhat embarrassing to produce this plot
almost 2 years after the event, and to see that my
suspicions should have been raised much earlier,
but it is also probably true
that such an interval is necessary to generate sufficient data
to allow this qualitative change to manifest itself - and maybe even
then its reality will be considered somewhat in the eye of the beholder.
However, I do feel that suitable statistical processing -- eg monthly
means -- would make the deterioration quantitatively convincing
also.
Iain Coulson
Latest Update : 02 Jan 2003
|