|
20030405 report
Tracking experiments / continued
A summary of the results presented on
18 March :
-
The pointing residuals obtained when the track model is disabled
are well matched by the predicted residuals, as derived from the
inclinometry formalism:
-
(yaw)     F1 = gLLY + gRLR
-
(roll)     F2 = g2TX
-
(pitch)   F3 = g3TY
-
daz = F2*sin(el) - F1*cos(el)
-
del = F3
Somewhat by default, we have been using
gL = -gR = -g2 = -g3 = 1,
and the expectation was that tracking data would help finesse the values
of these coefficients.
-
The
earlier
analysis of tracking residuals obtained when the track model was
enabled
suggested that perhaps the F2 term of the track model
was not being applied at all !
To test this, the current model was modified as shown below :
......
......
177.29 -4.04 3.65 -2.67
177.49 -3.37 4.15 -2.22
177.69 -3.51 4.15 -1.99
178.09 -3.37 44.17 -1.75
179.09 -2.74 44.65 -1.17
180.09 -1.49 44.90 -0.46
181.09 -1.10 44.83 -0.35
182.09 -0.62 44.99 0.03
183.09 -0.19 4.89 0.59
184.09 0.04 4.68 0.79
185.09 1.19 4.77 1.17
......
......
. . . adding 40" to the F2 term near southern transit. On UT
20030404, 3c279 was
tracked using SCUBA
through this azimuth range. The observed pointing residuals are
shown below :
The 40" modification to F2 generates a +15.3" excursion in daz,
(stimulating the -15.3" recovery recorded here)
confirming that the track model is being applied. However, the
size of this excursion is that expected if the F2 contribution to
daz was F2*cos(el) [ 40" x cos(64.4) = 17.3", actually ],
whereas it's supposed to be sin(el) !
UT20030409
After adding -40" to the F1 term of the default track model, similar
tracking data were obtained on UT 20030409 :
The -40" modification to F1 generates a +17.0" excursion in daz,
stimulating the -17.0" recovery recorded here.
By comparison with the expected excursion size of 40cos(64.4) = 17.3"
this confirms that,
vis-a-vis F1, the track model is being applied
as expected.
En passant the elevation tracking data through this period of
0.5 hours, and through transit, show no sign of any transit
effect, with an rms scatter of 0.9".
Iain Coulson
Latest Update : 10 Apr 2003
|