Joint Astronomy Centre
Show document only
JAC Home
JCMT
UKIRT
Contact info
JAC Divisions
OMP
Outreach
Seminars
Staff-only Wiki
Weather
Web Cameras
____________________

JCMT home
Telescope
Pointing
20061218 report

HARP pointing over the past 3 nights (UT20061215-17)


HARP has been used recently during regular observing (although it is not commissioned). Three nights' data are displayed below with no attempt to remove nightly collimation offsets:

Click for better view or here for .ps

The data separate into two (or 3 !?) blocks in several of the sub-displays:

  • the centre-left plot of dS-vs-Z shows ~-25arcseconds separating 15 measures from the majority, while
  • the Up-Down-Left-Right plot (lower left) shows 3 groups:
    • the aforementioned '15' loosely clustered on the right
    • 4 measures at high-elevation, transiting in the north, and
    • the bulk remainder
    They are separated by about 25" and roughly occupy the vertices of an approximately equilateral triangle.
The current deficiency of k-mirror-specific terms in our pointing model was expected to lead to either increased observed scatter in the pointing residuals or (if we're lucky) to obvious sytematic error manifolds in such plots. Distinct groupings such as this seems to reflect a separate issue, possibly concerning the selection of the k-mirror angle and the interpretation thereafter by the pointing analysis software.

The '15' measures come in two time-contiguous groups; measures 2 thru 9 on UT20061215, and measures 1-7 on UT20061217. Log entries preceding entry #9 on UT15 suggest 'kmirror engineering' (although 'exercising' may be a better description), but there is no commentary in the logs to explain the pointing jump on the 17th.

However, the k-mirror values themselves follow this pattern :

  • - the bulk of these data were taken with -ve k-mirror values
  • - the '15' are the only measures taken with +ve k-mirror values
  • - three of the 'high northern four' have extreme -ve k-mirror values ( < -50 )

The '15' cover the same range of parallactic angle, Q, as the 'bulk', whereas 3 of the '4' are at uniquely +ve Q>150.

Dividing the data into these groups for analysis via TPOINT meets the same problems described earlier; with a full 7-parameter optimization leaving residuals of ~(4",4") in (dS,dZ) indicating, as before, and at the very least, the need for other terms.

20061220
These data don't look nearly so potent when plotted in what I consider a more raw form :

Click for better view or here for .ps

There are clear systematic errors (requiring adjustment to the mode parameters), and possible large-ish residual scatter (requiring new parameters, as previously speculated), but there's no sign here of the groupings seen above. In particular: compare the middle sub-plot here (del-vs-El) with what ought to be its mirror image above (dZ-vs-Z, also the middle sub-plot).

Contact: Iain Coulson. Updated: Wed Dec 20 13:03:28 HST 2006

Return to top ^