970409 report
Tracking 970408
jas at the helm
Mars was tracked over the azimuth range 99 - 123. The behaviour of
the azimuth residuals show the problems due to the faulty central
bearing :
The residuals have the
form previously seen
now with amplitude 5.2" at (az,el) = (109,58).  
The previous algorithm would have suggested an amplitude here of 6.1".
The
figure does not correct the data for the time-(az-)lag in the logging
process, but thanks to the fairly high resolution of the data (one logged
datum each 70 seconds) the location
of the bearing problem at this azimuth can be well-established.
The logging is the last event in the cycle and Jason reckons that
the mid-point of the data-collection occurs at about the mid-point ofthe
cycle.
The peak and trough occur at (are logged at) uncorrected azimuths
of 108.6 and 110.4, the corrected values then being 108.5 and 110.2.
TEL_EMPIRICAL.dat currently produces the peak and trough at 108.3 and
109.9.
Conclusions ?
Given
- the scatter elsewhere in the diagram,
- the different (increased) resolution
of this new data compared with that used to set up TEL_EMPIRICAL, and
- Justin's (and others') concerns about the noise in the azimuth
drives,
these data probably do
not suggest that TEL_EMPIRICAL needs changing at this time.
The elevation residuals showed a very strong trend with time,
which
also correlates with temperature differential by the amount of 12.6" for
each degree C of difference between the front and back legs.
This trend with this size has been seen several times recently and
should be correctable by a suitable adjustment to the temp_slope
parameter. After correction for this thermal effect the mean rms residual
of 75 logged data was 1.0", with no indication of any effect at about
azimuth 110 due to the central bearing.
Return to POINTING REPORTS
imc@jach.hawaii.edu
|