Thermal Lag between JCMT Dish and Legs
Thermal Lag between JCMT Dish and Legs
The use of the antenna LEG temperatures in the role of ANTENNA
temperatures has always been a cause for concern inasmuch as there is
the possibility of a time lag between one and the other. However,
even when fairly extreme thermal changes do occur
there has been no record (yet) of behaviour from the elevation residuals
that might be attributable to lag.
Temperature data from the dish (backing structure) is
occasionally taken by Fred Baas for use in the surface upgrades
program, and analysis of some of these data and contemperaneous leg
temperatures provides insight into any possible thermal lag.
For this purpose, a recent large set of dish data, taken from about 8pm
April 11 to about 11am April 14, 1997 (during weekend observations of
Comet Hale-Bopp) was analysed.
One temperature probe was identified at random as yielding a
continuous stream of uncorrupted data - this is unit #25 in Fred's
scheme of things. It's thermal behaviour is shown in
Fig.1 - (ignore the label "#3").
The absolute temperature scale is also, at this stage, unknown, but
is of less importance just now than the cyclic behaviour.
Samples are collected approximately every 4 minutes - this data stream
represents exactly 1001 such measurements.
For comparison we show in
Fig.2 the behaviour of the mean leg temperature over the entire 4-day
interval starting at 1997 April 11.0   . The profiles for the
periods during which these data overlap are remarkably
similar and allow a meaningful comparison of any phase lag :
|
|
| Fig.1 |
Fig.2 |
If I can get to it, I ought to superimpose these data in one diagram.
Results
The times of 2 maxima and 2 minima were determined from each dataset :
Dish Legs
d h m d h m
Max 1 12 15 48 12 17 30
Min 1 13 07 30 13 07 30
Max 2 13 15 02 13 16 00
Min 2 14 06 49 14 07 45
Times are accurate to approximately 10 minutes for the dish data, 15
minutes for the leg data.
The average phase lag for maxima = 80 minutes, for minima = 28 minutes.
As mentioned in the previous report, a further upgrade to these
pointing algorithms could be necessary. This may require
that we
-
estimate the future temperature of the antenna based on the current
temperatures of the legs, with some knowledge of previous profiles
and their evolution with time, or
- use the antenna (dish ?, backing structure ?)
temperatures as our real-time working temperature.
Return to POINTING REPORTS
Iain Coulson
29 April 1997
|