Further analysis of elevation pointing
Further analysis of elevation pointing
Trends of del with time (probably => mean temperature of the legs),
observed between 1997 April 16th and 26th, were used to
implement a new correction to the elevation pointing.
This begs the question - were there such trends in previous data ?
(in what follows, this trend will be referred to as the trend .)
The table below shows the pointing data of the last few months
which ought to have revealed such a trend . These data are
identified
by typically having
- a sufficiently large size (N-points > 10 )
- an uncomfortably large residual elevation pointing error ( rms-del
> 2.0" ), particularly when compared to that for azimuth
- a sufficiently large span of temperature or front-to-back
temperature differential.
However, given that almost no datasets of the latter part of 1996
satisfy these conditions, they are relaxed somewhat for that period.
The columns of the table show
- the dataset - by date
- the FE
- the number of data
- the raw rms scatters in daz
- the raw rms scatters in del
- the slope of the best fit line in the del - vs- (Tf-Tb) plane
- the rms scatter of del about this line
- the slope of the best fit line in the del - vs- 0.5*(Tf+Tb) plane
- the rms scatter of del about this line
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
dataset FE N raw rms del-vs- new_rms del-vs- new_rms
daz del (Tf-Tb) 0.5*(Tf+Tb)
961011_17 S 26 1.1 1.5 -6.2 +- 7.4 1.5 1.3 +- 1.6 1.5
961128_01 A 12 1.9 1.8 4.2 +- 4.7 1.7 1.3 +- 0.6 1.5
961207_20 B 21 1.8 2.0 -6.4 +- 2.1 1.7 1.1 +- 0.9 1.9
961218_16 B 10 2.1 2.0 3.7 +- 1.4 1.5 0.8 +- 0.3 1.5
970127_01 A 17 2.1 3.9 -5.5 +- 0.9 2.2 -4.3 +- 0.6 2.0
970130 B 15 3.4 3.6 20.3 +-12.1 3.3 -2.0 +- 1.2 3.3
970201-03 B 17 4.0 3.6 15.0 +- 8.6 3.3 1.4 +- 0.6 3.0
970207_20 A 84 2.8 3.7 2.8 +- 6.2 3.7 3.4 +- 0.2 1.6 *
970223_05 A 7 1.3 3.2 3.7 +- 1.2 2.1 2.5 +- 0.5 1.5 *c
970228_16 A 9 2.0 2.8 -4.4 +- 5.0 2.7 -1.5 +- 1.5 2.7
970306-07 A 7 1.7 2.4 0.6 +- 2.2 2.4 0.5 +- 0.4 2.1
970309_05 B 6 1.2 2.4 2.4 +- 0.9 1.7 1.2 +- 0.4 1.5 *c
970312-13 A 8 1.2 2.7 18.0 +- 4.6 1.6 1.3 +- 0.4 1.8
970313_17 A 10 1.9 3.8 9.5 +- 2.0 2.1 2.2 +- 0.8 2.9
970319_17 B 8 1.4 4.0 10.0 +- 1.3 1.4 4.5 +- 0.9 2.0
970321_05 A 7 2.2 4.7 12.6 +- 0.7 0.9 0.1 +- 0.6 0.9 c
970325_21 A 34 1.6 2.4 11.8 +- 3.0 2.0 0.1 +- 0.4 2.0
970401_01 A 6 1.9 4.2 18.3 +- 4.4 2.1 -1.2 +- 1.1 2.0
970405_07 S 29 2.1 4.5 18.3 +- 1.7 2.0 0.0 +- 1.0 2.0 c
970405 S 70 1.3 2.9 11.6 +- 1.0 1.7 0.2 +- 0.2 1.7
970406_02 S 18 2.4 4.2 15.9 +- 1.3 1.4 -0.1 +- 0.5 1.4 c
970406-07 S 28 1.5 3.2 8.0 +- 2.6 2.8 1.1 +- 0.3 2.2 *c
970407-08 S 25 1.9 3.0 4.1 +- 4.5 3.0 1.0 +- 0.2 2.0 *
970408_17 S 75 1.3 2.3 12.7 +- 0.7 1.0 0.7 +- 0.3 1.0
970409_18 S 42 1.9 2.3 3.2 +- 0.9 2.0 0.9 +- 0.3 2.0
0.0 +- 0.3 2.0
970416-17 B 13 0.7 1.3 2.5 +- 3.1 1.2 0.7 +- 0.2 0.8 *
0.7 +- 0.1 0.7
970420 S 15 1.3 2.3 4.7 +- 1.0 1.4 1.1 +- 0.2 1.1 *c
0.3 +- 0.2 1.3
970424_01 A 12 0.5 1.6 -6.0 +- 2.5 1.3 1.2 +- 0.5 1.3
0.7 +- 0.4 1.2
970425_01 S 11 0.5 1.7 -13.0 +- 2.7 1.0 2.4 +- 0.4 0.7 *
0.4 +- 0.4 0.9
970425-26 S 17 1.2 2.2 -4.1 +- 1.9 1.9 1.0 +- 0.2 1.2 *c
0.9 +- 0.1 1.1
970426_17 S 16 1.6 2.3 4.6 +- 2.1 2.0 1.4 +- 0.2 1.0 *c
1.0 +- 0.2 1.4
970428_20 S 10 1.3 1.3 6.3 +- 3.0 1.1 1.3 +- 0.3 0.7 *
0.5 +- 0.4 1.0
970501-02 S 15 1.4 1.8 1.3 +- 1.8 1.8 0.8 +- 0.1 1.0 *
0.7 +- 0.2 1.2
Note the following :
- Prior to 970320 the value of TEMP_SLOPE was 6.5"/deg. This parameter
corrects elevation pointing for differential front-to-back leg
temperatures. On 970320 the value of TEMP_SLOPE was
incorrectly adjusted to 16.5"/deg, and on 970409 it was adjusted to
3.5"/deg. The elevation data between 970320 and 970409 have therefore
been corrected by the derived del-vs-(Tf-Tb) relationship before
deriving the slope in the del -vs- 0.5*(Tf+Tb) plane shown here.
The fact that the derived slopes in the 0.5*(Tf+Tb) plane
are then essentially 0.0 shows that, within that period and prior to
970406, there was no observable trend .
- For data after April 09th the table shows the fit of
del -vs- 0.5*(Tf+Tb)
both before and after correction for the del-vs-(Tf-Tb) relation,
in order to produce fits comparable with those for the period
970320-970409.
- An asterisk at the end of the line implies a significant
improvement (reduction) in the scatter in del by fitting against
0.5*(Tf+Tb) when compared to either the raw residuals or to the fit
with (Tf-Tb), and a >3-sigma determination for the slope of the line
in the del-vs-0.5*(Tf+Tb) plane.
- A 'c' indicates that the data were taken while
observing comet Hale-Bopp or in the 24 hours thereafter.
These facts lead to the following results and conclusions :
- The first observed instance of the trend occurred on 07 Feb,
although comet-observing had been in progress before that.
- 3-days-per-week observing of the comet started in March, while
it was occasionally being observed 2-days per week even in October
1996.
- There are 12 instances with significant trends ,
half of which are linked to comet observing, and there are 3 other
datasets linked to comet observing where no trend is seen.
So, 2/3 of comet-related pointing data for which this analysis is
possible show the effect, while it occurs occasionally in other data.
I would say that the hypothesis that the trend is somehow linked
to observing the comet is supported by the data.
There is insufficient data to suggest, for instance, that the effect
lingers for some period after comet observing before disappearing.
Continuous monitoring of the elevation pointing ought to reveal whether
this effect is permanent or transient.
Return to POINTING REPORTS
Iain Coulson
05 May 1997
|