981115 report
Inclinometry with 'Spare' inclinometer on left A-frame
Summary
On 981115 inclinometry was done with the spare inclinometer
mounted next to the
one on the left A-frame, and plugged into the channels that usually
carry data from that on the right A-frame; i.e. we will measure
the left A-frame with two meters :
Datasets HST start mean leg temperatures Humidity
start middle end %
inc981114 (regular) 11:05 2.4 3.5 4.7 20
inc981115 (2 lefts) 10:33 2.5 3.9 5.1 40
The regular data of 981114
The model created from the 981114 regular data was not installed ;
mainly because it wasn't processed until 981117 and because there are
large differences between the new model and the previous one that
confirm the general instability of the model currently :
The double measurement of the L-A-frame
The raw data from the X- Y- and T-channels are shown below, with S
representing the measures from the Spare inclinometer (on the L-A-frame).
The scales are all in mV, with 20mV = 1" of tilt and 10mV = 1 deg C of
temperature :
The similarity between the measures from the two inclinometers on the
L-A-frame is striking. This essentially confirms that the L inclinometer
is performing adequately. However, the detailed differences are shown
below :
The differences (ripples of up to 1" amplitude on 6" systematics) are not
apparently thermal. The data may prove useful in refining
(indeed, in activating) the thermal correction algorithms within the
inclinometry reduction software.
(Note added 981119)
However, the data may also be used to
check if the
symmetry of an inclinometry
dataset is dependent upon the particular inclinometer in use. To this end
the table below shows 'symmetry' measures from some recent data covering
periods of both 'good' and 'bad' symmetry. Note :
-
the correlation
between TY and RY is 'good' because the two are servo-ed together.
A plot of one against the other lies along a line of slope unity with
rms scatter of about 0.7"
-
The phase-shifted, sign-inverted LY is at times well correlated with RY
(~1.5) and at other times badly correlated (>2.5).
-
Because RY is disabled by the inclusion of SY, we must perform such a
comparison via TY, hence the column below showing the LY-TY correlation.
-
The last column shows the one SY-TY correlation.
| date |
TY -vs- RY |
LY -vs- RY |
LY -vs- TY |
SY -vs- TY |
| 981107 |
0.69 |
2.84 |
2.85 |
  |
| 981109 |
0.69 |
3.08 |
3.03 |
  |
| 981110 |
0.67 |
1.98 |
1.92 |
  |
| 981111 |
0.65 |
2.47 |
2.46 |
  |
| 981112 |
0.72 |
2.34 |
2.18 |
  |
| 981114 |
0.78 |
1.22 |
1.05 |
  |
| 981115 |
  |
  |
2.13 |
1.52 |
| 981117 |
0.68 |
1.34 |
1.29 |
  |
The correlations of LY with either RY or TY are almost identical,
so the value of 2.13 on 981115 indicates neither a particularly good nor
bad condition. The SY-TY value on that day (1.52) might indicate that the
LY data is suspiciously bad, and that the current inclinometer in use on
the left A-frame is suspect. Further evidence will be sought.
Iain Coulson
19 Nov 1998
|