991228 report
Tracking
SUMMARY
3c273 was tracked for several hours to check the pointing & tracking
models. Tracking accuracy is better than 1" rms in azimuth, 2" in
elevation, over an interval of >3h.
Three hours of data was collected with SCUBA, using the
map16
procedure, on a night when tau was too high (> 0.2)
to do the scheduled observing.
Three observations of 100 integrations each were executed :
- from (az,el) = (109,47) at HST 03:45 to (214,69) at 07:10.
- with a transit at elevation 72 degrees at HST 06:25.
The resulting pointing residuals are shown below, both separately
(note the different scales) and together :
-
The rms scatters in (daz,del) in each subset are (0.5",0.8"),
(0.5",0.5") (0.4",1.3").
The seeing during these 1h periods was approximately
0.7", 0.4", 0.5" respectively.
The totality of data has scatters of (0.7",1.8").
-
This is not the perfect test of the track model, for which
we should do more at lower elevations (not possible in these
condition), but it does indicate that the general tracking
performance can be better than 1" rms (total vector) over
1h intervals, and better than 2" over 3h.
-
The performance, especially in azimuth, is a considerable improvement on
similar tests done on
990618 ,
and justifies the change in the yaw factor (1.00 from 1.21) introduced on
991105 in the production of track models from inclinometry data.
(Yaw affects the azimuth pointing only).
Iain Coulson
28 Dec 1999
|