|
CIT6 - uncertainty in its position
CIT6 - uncertainty in its position
Pointing on CIT6 during Nov 2001 caused some consternation.
The fault report as it stood on 08 Nov is reported in full
here.
CIT6 is a.k.a. RW LMi, IRC+30219, AFGL 1403.
Its positions are quoted variously as :
| Source |
R.A |
Dec |
Eq. |
Notes |
JCMT catalog ver.1 |
10 13 10.7 |
30 49 17   |
RB1950 |
original source unclear |
JCMT catalog ver.2000 |
10 16 02.0 |
30 34 19.01 |
RJ2000 |
presumably after precession |
Carlstrom et al 1988 AJ 100, 213 |
10 13 10.942         +0.012
|
30 49 16.75         + 0.15
|
RB1950 |
Hat Creek. Interfr.
HCN maser epoch 1988.11 No p.m.'s available |
| Carlstrom et al |
10 16 02.29 |
30 34 18.8 |
RJ2000 |
precessed from above |
Neri
et al 1993 A&AS 130, 1 |
10 16 02.34         +0.03
|
30 34 18.3         + 0.6
|
RJ2000 |
IRAM interfr. |
| JCMT |
10 16 02.05 |
30 34 19.0 |
RJ2000 |
re-precessed from JCMT 1950 value |
[ Gezari et al 1993, NASA Ref. Publ. 1294 "Catalog of Infrared
Observations" list other (RB 1950) positions. ]
The current (J2000) coordinates being used at JCMT are odd in their
apparent coarseness in RA and specificity in Dec. However, inaccurate
precession is not the cause of any error. It is unclear at this stage
where our 1950 coordinates came from, but the precessed-to-2000 version
seems to suffer some typographical contraction, and it would seem prudent
to adopt the interferometric measures in preference.
The fixed difference in (RA,Dec) between the (coarse) JCMT position and
the Carlstrom position generates the (az,el) error pattern shown below :
It resembles the transit effect although is of an amplitude
somewhat smaller than that observed Nov 04 & 05.
However, it seems reasonable to conclude that an erroneous position
of the magnitude suggested in the table above is substantially the cause
of these recent events.
The behaviour on 05/06 May 2001 was described in the
fault report as tolerable.
Actually, CIT6 is deviant by about 7" in elevation on the 05th in the
sense seen above (my mitsake). On the 06th one measurement of two was
made at a time when the errors would be small anyhow, and the other,
if corrected according to the curves above, would still not seem
too deviant in the context of the other systematics pervading these
data.
08 Nov 2001The JCMT catalog entry for CIT6 is updated to
reflect the Carlstom coordinates.
The precision (and accuracy) of other sources in our catalog -
particularly the 'spectral line' sources - will be examined soon,
although at first glance none seems so egregious as CIT6.
Iain Coulson
09 Nov 2001
|