JCMT Inclinometry
JCMT Inclinometry
The need to measure the track profile
If the antenna was driven around on a flat horizontal track the
7-parameter pointing model would suffice to control the pointing.
However, the track is neither of these things, and so as the antenna
rotates, the wheels, and hence the antenna frame, and hence the elevation
axis, and hence the beam are all caused to deviate from their demanded
positions.
The track is composed of 14 segments of 2 sizes, all of which bow somewhat
in the middle. The segmental shape and the joints, generating pointing
excursions of size ~10", especially when
the wheels pass over the joints.
The
antenna wheels
are truncated tapered cones, made of thick, but machined, aluminum;
with surface accuracies of (xxxx).
The locations of the wheel/joint interactions, in terms of
antenna azimuth are given
here .
(Note also that the track segments were welded together during
1997 ).
The track profile must be
determined - by inclinometry - and appropriate corrections
made to the pointing.
The need for, use of, and reduction of data from the
inclinometry system are described in several
technical reports from the Pointing Project.
The inclinometers - their location, orientation and performance
Inclinometry is achieved with (wait for it !) inclinometers !
Our meters are
701-series (-2A)
products of
Applied Geomechanics Inc
(though see also similar products by
Wyler of Switzerland, as used,
eg, at
GBT).
The inclinometers measure tilts in 2 orthogonal directions, and we usually
have them at 3 locations :
- #2036 is on the TMU platform
- which is as close as we can get
to "on the elevation axis".
- (#4486 was once on the TMU itself,
and was therefore 'tiltable' (see detail)).
- #1969 is
on the Left A-frame,
and
- #1970 is on the Right A-frame
- #0354 is our current Spare - recently (Jan 2004) repaired
by the manufacturer.
- #5652 was purchased in Jan 2004. We will hold it as a spare, but
its arrival prompts thoughts that perhaps there are new measurements we
could make - not necessarily to define the track profile, but perhaps
as diagnostics for other characterization of the antenna motion.
Placing inclinometrers on the 'radial arms', between the central plinth
and each wheel, was previously deemed useful in diagnosing problems with
the wheels, but would obviously also provide the track profile relevant
to that wheel (convolved with any vertical plinth motion, of course . .
.).
Hence our codes T,L,R,S - although there is a choice of inclinometer at
the TMU station.
They operate within +200" of the horizon, so need precise
levelling. Electronically, the signals from the X & Y axes and from the
built-in thermometer (T) are fed through seperate
DGH series 1000 analog input
sensors clustered in the grey boxes
(see detail) before
reaching the VAX. Pins
1 & 2 provide the voltage, and should be
probed when levelling. The DGH units for the X axis, Y axis and
Temperature are housed together in small grey
boxes in a standard
arrangement.
In their normal configurations, the T, L and R
inclinometers have their
Y-axes pointing towards the front
of the antenna/building and the X-axes pointing to the right.
The radial-arm configuration should have the Y-axis pointing radially
outwards, the X-axis pointing in the CW direction.
- TX gives roll (F2),
- TY gives pitch (F3) , and
- via the geometry of the telescope, LY, & RY give yaw (F1)
(F1,F2,F3) are given for each azimuth in a lookup table.
The following plots or links show, in units of arcseconds, the
variation with azimuth of
-
TX, LX, RX - showing the strong correlation between all these
tilts, indicating that the entire antenna structure rocks
(for want of a better word) almost as a single unit
-
TY, LY, RY - note the strong correlation between RY and TY (as
may be expected since the tilting of the right-hand A-frame feeds
into the elevation encoder which, via the SERVO, drives the elevation
axis to compensate) and that the LY data is merely of the reverse
sign and different in phase by 180 degrees. This is more easily
seen if the LY data is plotted
after the sign reversal and phase change . Such a good
correspondence implies good
symmetry in the
response of the antenna to the track.
-
F1, F2, F3 - the track model derived from TX, TY, LY, RY
- The long term stability of the track
model.
-
the differences in (F1,F2,F3) between a recent track model and
the previous one. Although mainly noise, these spectra reveal
joint-related spikes that have been disturbingly large -
see the many such reports during
1997 and
1998 -
although an
explanation has recently emerged.
Each of the two orthogonal tilt meters is
accurate to 1 microradians (0.2") - which we can confirm empirically. They
operate effectively within about a half degree of horizontal. With the
gain settings at low, and filter settings off,
their output voltages
scale as 20mV = ~1".
Other documents discuss
scales, and see
stability
in more depth.
For a discussion of the use of inclinometers in other scientific fields,
see, for instance, the
GRAVILUX Project, by Nicolas d'Oreye, and Nicolas's estimations
for
Earth-tidal tilts upon Hawaii
Follow these links for summaries of
Iain Coulson
Last Updated: 25 Mar 2004
|