Joint Astronomy Centre
Show document only
JAC Home
JCMT
UKIRT
Contact info
JAC Divisions
OMP
Outreach
Seminars
Staff-only Wiki
Weather
Web Cameras
____________________

JCMT home
Telescope
Surface
RxH3 maps
RxH3 History
RxH2 Maps
Some Beam Maps
Ruze Efficiencies
RxH3 Receiver
OOF Maps
ASCS (old)
Movies (old)
Surface changes, June-November 2004

Surface changes, June - November 2004

The aim of this study is to find:

  1. How stable is the surface of the telescope during the night from day to day.
  2. How does the surface change after opening roof and doors at the beginning of the night.
  3. What are the main causes of surface changes.

On 16 June 2004, eight surface maps were made with RxH3 between 17h36 and 01h24 the next morning. Roof and doors were opened at about 17h30 (there was some local fog and clouds). The first seven maps were made at 80 GHz, the last map at 160 GHz. During the night the CSO tau decreased from 0.16 to 0.10 but tau was quite noisy until 19h as can be seen in this plot, This can cause non-existing structures in RxH3 maps (e.g. stripes). The humidity at the JCMT increased somewhat, but not dramatically. The weather station at UKIRT, and the 350 micron tau meter did not work

On 11 November 2004 nine maps were observed between 17h19 and 01h25 in the same way as on 16 June: eight 80 GHz maps and one 160 GHz map. The map parameters are listed in Table 2. Because I concluded that phase and amplitude data of calibration measurements do not add more information, I did not make these figures for this date (may do it later though). During the maps the CSO-tau at the JCMT decreased from about 0.10 and then remained fairly (but not very) stable around 0.05. The humidity decreased strongly during the first map from 80% to 40% and then varied only little during the next maps.

In addition, 80 GHz maps were made on 5 other nights in June around shiftchange: 5, 6, 9, 12, and 15 June (here the date is the HST date of the beginning of the night), and on 8 August, 9 September, and 17 November. On those nights the tau was better than on 16 June and more stable (see table below). Also, 160 GHz map were made on 11 July, 8 August, 9 September, and 17 November. During most of these maps the phase monitor was not yet or no longer working.

All maps can be seen in the reduction summary (click below 'surface'), as well as by clicking on name in Column 1 of the following tables. The scale is here from -50 to +50 micron and one can clearly see the structure (scalloping) of the individual panels.

Using the new, preliminary, masking of 80 GHz maps mean rms values were derived for the maps (see tables below). Given are the average rms of the whole map (excluding the masked parts) and the adjuster rms. The time is for the middle of each map (with 80 GHz maps taking 50 minutes and 160 GHz maps 1 hour 40 minutes). Because of still unknown reasons the adjuster rms is larger at 80 GHz than at 160 GHz.

Table 1. Maps of 16 June:

map freq time rms rms(adj) Phasecal Ampcal Weather
Map 1 80 18h01 30.9 34.4 8x2s 8x2sx16f 50min
Map 2 80 18h56 29.4 31.1 8x2s 8x2sx16f 50min
Map 3 80 19h46 38.2 41.5 8x2s 8x2sx16f 50min
Map 4 80 20h35 26.8 28.0 8x2s 8x2sx16f 50min
Map 5 80 21h25 28.5 29.5 8x2s 8x2sx16f 50min
Map 6 80 22h19 27.9 28.8 8x2s 8x2sx16f 50min
Map 7 80 23h09 31.0 32.7 8x2s 8x2sx16f 50min
Map 8 160 00h29 25.2 20.0 14x2s 14x2sx16f 100min

Table 2. Maps of 11 November:

map freq time rms rms(adj) Weather
Map 1 80 17h44 37.1 41.7 50min
Map 2 80 18h35 35.1 37.7 50min
Map 3 80 19h25 28.7 29.9 50min
Map 4 80 20h14 30.1 33.8 50min
Map 5 80 21h04 29.1 30.5 50min
Map 6 80 21h54 25.9 26.9 50min
Map 7 80 22h44 26.5 27.5 50min
Map 8 80 23h24 testmap reverse=1 (bad) 35min
Map 9 160 00h35 25.5 20.2 100min

Table 3. Other maps:

map freq rms rms(adj) tau CSO Phasecal Ampcal Weather
20040606-012607 80 26.5 27.3 0.06 8x2s 8x2sx16f 50min
20040607-024103 80 25.7 26.5 0.08 8x2s 8x2sx16f 50min
20040610-011851 80 25.4 26.5 0.06 8x2s 8x2sx16f 50min
20040613-013630 80 27.5 28.1 0.10 8x2s 8x2sx16f 50min
20040616-011557 80 28.7 29.3 0.10 8x2s 8x2sx16f 50min
20040712-001239 160 24.3 19.2 0.07 14x2s 14x2sx16f not available
20040808-224129 80 24.9 25.7 0.09 8x2s 8x2sx16f 50min
20040808-234534 160 23.4 17.4 0.11 14x2s 14x2sx16f 100min
20040909-015400 80 25.0 26.0 0.14 8x2s 8x2sx16f 50min
20040909-024418 160 23.3 17.9 0.12 14x2s 14x2sx16f 100min
20041117-211625 80 27.1 28.0 0.04 50min
20041118-010140 160 26.1 20.1 0.04 100min

One aim of the project is to see what are the changes in the surface between opening roof and doors in the afternoon and midnight when the dish has stabilized. On 16 June the rms was quite variable (Table 1), but the maps do not contain clear stripes which are the signs of an unstable atmosphere). These data are combined in the figure below with the results of 11 November (Table 2) and 16 April (discussed separately because an adjustment was made on 24 May).

This figure shows the rms of the surface as function of time for the three days when the surface was monitored, as well as for other maps in the period April - November 2004. The circles indicate 160 GHz maps. From days when consecutive 80 and 160 GHz maps were made, it appears that the rms in 80 GHz maps is on average 1.3 micron larger than in 160 GHz maps. The red curve shows a running average (over three datapoints) of the rms, using both 80 and 160 GHz maps, correcting the latter with the above amount. The 80 GHz rms decreases from about 34 micron after opening to about 26 micron around midnight, with the largest change occurring before 20h HST.
This is consistent with the results of a preliminary analysis of SCUBA FCF's (from 2003) at 850 and 450 micron.

On a number of days maps have been made in the afternoon just after opening roof and doors, which maps can be compared with a reference map made after midnight on 20040909. This comparison is made using these difference maps. At the bottom of that page there is also an analyses of temperature measurements. In general the changes in the surface are very similar on all these days. Maps made before the first adjustment based on RxH3 data are very noisy and only one example is shown (for 20020827). The conclusion is that the changes of the surface at the beginning of the shift are mainly due to the well-isolated centerbeams connecting the counterweight and the telescope through the cabin.

Three series of plots show the differences between the maps (with right the difference of the derived moves (make window wide enough). They are on a separate page because the time to load this page increased too much.
First I subtracted each map from the first map. This was done both for the observations of 16 June and 11 November.
The times indicated above the plots are again for the middle of the maps. All colour plots are scaled from -50 to +50 micron. The map roughly show the same structure as similar maps obtained on 24 April: positive differences near the centre of the dish and near the edges, but details differ: the location of the sectors with the positive differences in the outer dish are not the same. In addition the last difference maps (map 1 - map 6,7) show arc-shaped structures.
The second series of plots shows (at the above link) the difference between subsequent maps. Many of these plots show a striking striping pattern, as was also seen on previous occasions. These difference maps show decreasing values with maps 4 and 5 almost equal. But the next map shows again increasing differences. This reminds of the effects seen on 15 June 2002 (these maps were combined with tests of panel movements) and 24 April 2004, where also the difference between the last maps again increased.
The third series of plots show differences between different dates at 80 GHz and 160 GHz. Many of the difference maps show a more or less symmetric pattern. While some of them also show the well-known arched striping pattern, others show a large difference in the upper left or right part of the dish.

Finally, there are difference plots between 160 GHz maps from 2003 are shown here. The aim was to find which structures are visible in these maps. made on 11 February, 9 April, 19 May, 30 June, and 7 September. In between these maps, adjustments have been made on 5 March, 14 May, and 30 July.

To study the reliability of these maps, I show separately an analysis of the difference between seven pairs of 80 and 160 GHz maps. These maps were all made subsequently on the same day around midnight, so the telescope surface is expected to be stable. The conclusion is that differences between those maps match at 80 and 160 GHz, except for some days, such as 16 June 2004.

Table 4. The rms values of the difference maps.

map freq rms Q Remarks
16 June 2004 maps:
Map 1-2 80 12.7 aver arcs
Map 1-3 80 23.7 bad arcs
Map 1-4 80 16.9 good?
Map 1-5 80 18.9 aver arcs
Map 1-6 80 23.3 bad arcs
Map 1-7 80 22.6 bad arcs
Map 1-2 80 12.7 aver arcs
Map 2-3 80 25.8 bad arcs
Map 3-4 80 28.0 bad arcs
Map 4-5 80 9.6 good? some arcs
Map 5-6 80 15.7 bad arcs
Map 6-7 80 25.0 bad arcs
11 November 2004 maps:
Map 1-2 80 32.1 bad arcs
Map 1-3 80 26.0 bad arcs
Map 1-4 80 38.3 bad arcs
Map 1-5 80 33.1 bad arcs
Map 1-6 80 29.5 bad arcs
Map 1-7 80 28.7 bad arcs
Map 1-2 80 32.1 bad arcs
Map 2-3 80 20.1 bad arcs
Map 3-4 80 23.6 bad arcs
Map 4-5 80 25.1 bad arcs, stripes
Map 5-6 80 16.2 aver arcs, stripes
Map 6-7 80 14.9 aver arcs, stripes
Other maps: 80 GHz
0606-0506 80 11.6 aver stripes, arcs
0906-0506 80 12.7 aver arcs
1206-0506 80 15.6 bad arcs
1506-0506 80 23.5 bad arcs; large deviations sect. 7
1606-0506 80 19.7 bad arcs, stripes
0808-0506 80 15.4 aver arcs, stripes
0809-0506 80 13.2 aver stripes
1111-0506 80 19.9 bad arcs
1711-0506 80 17.7 bad stripes
0906-0606 80 8.0 good
1206-0606 80 13.3 good stripes
1506-0606 80 24.1 bad arcs; large deviations sect. 7
1606-0606 80 21.6 bad arcs
0808-0606 80 14.9 aver arcs; deviations sect. 6, 7
0809-0606 80 7.9 good
1111-0606 80 18.8 aver? large changes
1711-0606 80 15.3 aver arcs, stripes
1206-0906 80 12.9 good stripes
1506-0906 80 23.0 bad arcs
1606-0906 80 22.4 bad arcs
0808-0906 80 14.5 aver some arcs
0809-0906 80 8.1 good
1111-0906 80 20.1 bad arcs
1711-0906 80 17.1 aver arcs
1506-1206 80 27.5 bad large deviations sect. 4, 6, 7, 9, 10
1606-1206 80 23.6 bad weather
0808-1206 80 20.7 aver deciations sect. 9, 10, 6, 7
0809-1206 80 15.8 good deviations sect. 9, 10
1111-1206 80 18.5 aver arcs, stripes, deviations sect. 6. 7
1711-1206 80 19.8 aver arcs, stripes
1606-1506 80 21.7 bad large arcs; weather?
0808-1506 80 17.6 aver arcs; large deviation sect. 7
0908-1506 80 21.3 aver large deviation sect. 7
1111-1506 80 21.3 aver large deviation sect. 7
1711-1506 80 20.4 aver large deviation sect. 7
0808-1606 80 19.0 bad large arcs; weather?
0809-1606 80 20.2 bad large arcs; weather?
1111-1606 80 17.7 bad large arcs; weather?
1711-1606 80 18.6 bad arcs
0809-0808 80 11.5 aver some arcs
1111-0808 80 13.9 aver some arcs
1711-0808 80 15.7 aver some arcs, stripes
1111-0809 80 16.1 aver some arcs
1711-0809 80 13.8 aver some arcs, stripes
1711-1111 80 13.7 aver some arcs, stripes
Other maps: 160 GHz
1107-1606 160 18.1 aver large deviation sect. 6
0808-1606 160 10.5 good
0809-1606 160 15.3 good
1111-1606 160 13.8 good
1711-1606 160 17.8 good narrow arcs, deviation in sect. 6
0808-1107 160 13.5 aver narrow arcs
0809-1107 160 10.7 good
1111-1107 160 17.5 aver narrow arcs
1711-1107 160 15.8 good narrow arcs
0809-0808 160 12.0 good
1111-0808 160 13.5 good
1711-0808 160 15.7 good narrow arcs
1111-0809 160 16.3 good
1711-0809 160 16.2 good narrow arcs
1711-1111 160 16.5 good narrow arcs

An analysis of temperature measurements of the telescope for the same period is given here.

I divided the quality of difference maps into three catergories - good, aver, and bad, depending on the structures seen in the map (see below), in a somewhat subjective way. The rms in difference maps which are 'good' is in the range 8 - 16 micron.

Structures seen in (some) difference maps:

  1. Horizontal stripes, one pixel thick.
  2. Wider, bended structures (about 1.5 m between maxima), amplitude 20-40 micron, referred to as 'arcs' (is there a better term?).
  3. Large deviations at edge, typically over 3 sectors, up to 100 micron.
  4. Between start shift - later, deviations have opposite sign in centre, edge and middle parts of dish of about +/- 40 micron (or more).
  5. Often, but not always, difference maps show some mirror symmetry.

Possible causes of structures in maps:
-Temperature changes of dish
-Weather: We know already since the first RxH3 maps that unstable tau values are correlated with horizontal stripes in maps.
-Scanning (pointing errors)
-Other effects, e.g. bleeding of the signal

Typical relative temperature changes of different parts of the dish:

  1. The temperature difference between centerbeams (average) and conebars changes by about 5-7C between day and night (discussed here).
  2. Relative temperature changes in differnt parts of the backing structure between 18h and 24h are of order 1C or less (but can amount to 2C for parts of the inner backing structure). Also relative changes between conebars, coneheads, and spinebars are small, but occasionally larger differences are found (see these plots).
  3. The inner parts of the backing structure are always warmer by 2 - 5C, sometimes even much more, than the outer parts, possibly due to heat coming from the cabin. See here.
  4. The observing history (e.g. doing holography) of the dish changes the temperature distribution slightly, but this appears to be a secondary effect.

The influence of the atmosphere: calibration measurements:
During all maps, 8 (80 GHz) or 14 (160 GHz) 2 second calibration measurements are made at a fixed offset position. These measurements were analysed to see whether they show effects due to the weather (causing the stripes and other defects in the maps). The conclusion seems to be that bad weather causes variations in most cases on time scales longer than 2 seconds.

The RxH3 log gives one map which was mad in particularly bad weather on 20030613. This figure shows a differencemap compared to 20040808: there are strong stripes, and possibly one arc in the upper part of the figure.

The cause of the arclike structures is not clear. They appear to be much more prominent at 80 GHz than at 160 GHz. Although in a dish which is not flat, one might expect non-linear deviations to occur, im my opinion these structures vary too fast to be real. This is particularly well visible in the difference maps at 80 GHz and 160 GHz for 16 June (wrt 8 August) where the strong 80 GHz arcs are invisible at 160 GHz.

Conclusions:
-The rms of the nighttime surface varies from night to night by 8 - 15 micron (as seen in difference maps), or less (due to defects in these map such as stripes and arcs).
-The (80 GHz) rms of the dish varies from opening to midnight from about 34 to 26 micron (the probably more realistic 160 GHz rms is 1.3 micron smaller); during part of the period the 160 GHz rms was better than 23 micron at night).
-The best way to improve the surface in early evening is to remove the cause of the changes, i.e. the large changes in temperature difference between centerbeams (in the cabin) and the other parts of the dish.
-Alternatively, with some more measurements, average corrections (moves tables) could be derived, but this would mean frequent adjustments (e.g. every 30 minutes), which process then has to be automated.
-The best way to improve the nighttime surface is to repair four adjusters which have large errors.
-Further improvements can be made when the cause of arclike structures in RxH3 difference maps can be found, which now prevent more accurate studies in many cases.

Contact: Jan Wouterloot. Updated: Fri Dec 3 09:40:19 HST 2004

Return to top ^