Using the Echelle
   
Up:
CGS4Handbook
NOTES ON USING THE ECHELLE GRATING IN CGS4.
When using the echelle grating there are more details that need to be checked
than with the low resolution gratings. These are summarised in this note.
1. Pixel and Slit Sizes.
Due to anamorphic demagnification, CGS4's square pixels do not view a square
patch of sky. Although the solid angle seen by a pixel is constant, the
shape is a function of grating angle. The difference from a square field
of view is very small at the low angles of the first order gratings, but
is quite prominent at echelle angles. For example, at the nominal blaze
angle of 64 degrees pixels are more elongated in the spatial direction
than the dispersion direction by a factor of ~1.6. With the long camera
at angles close to optimum the pixel size is 0.91 arcsec (spatially) X
0.40 arcsec (spectrally). The nominally 1-pixel wide slit is in fact about
1.3 pixels wide. The 2-pixel wide slit is 2-pixels wide (ie. 2arcsec spectrally).
The change in shape of the pixels as a function of grating angle is
very rapid at large angles. As a consequence, when using the echelle you
should always measure the size of the pixels by peaking up in two rows.
Edit the QUAD_SLIDE EXEC to put in the correct offset between the rows
being used when nodding (see also the comment on slit alignment below).
2. Curvature
The slit is slightly curved, so atmospheric and arc lines are not quite
perfectly aligned on one column of the array. In addition the dispersion
axis is also slightly curved, so that the spectrum of a point source is
not perfectly along one row of the detector. Both of these effects are
present with the low resolution gratings, but they are more significant
with the echelle. The curvature of the dispersion direction means that
the dispersion has slight dependance on row on the array. This means that
if an arc/atmospheric/astronomical line is straight along a column of the
array in the middle of the array, lines at the edge of the array will not
be so well aligned. In the dispersion direction the curvature amounts to
approx 0.5pixels across the 256 pixels. In the spatial direction the misaligment
with the columns due to curvature is about 0.1-0.5 pixels close to the
centre of the array, depending on grating angle. For point sources nodded
along about 30 rows the effects are very small and it is still reasonable
to combine the two nodded spectra to cancel sky lines.
There is software available, for example in Figaro, which was designed
to remove these sorts of distortion for optical spectrographs. There is
information about using these in the CGS4 data reduction notes in
correcting
curvature in CGS4 spectra . Using these techniques a residual distortion
of less than 1% can be obtained. However, in conditions of good seeing,
CGS4 data are undersampled in the spatial dimension and this may mean that
the effects cannot be fully removed.
Slit alignment
The curvature of the slits means that even if the postion angle is nominally
N-S on the sky there will be a small (0.3 - 1 arcsec) E-W offset when you
nod along the slit. Since this offset depends on the grating angle and
how far along the slit that you choose to nod, it means that you should
measure it for each echelle wavelength/order that you observe at. After
you have measured the offset between the two rows : In the QUAD_SLIDE Exec
you need to
replace the line
SLIDE SLIT offset
with the command
SLIDE RAoff DECoff
where RAoff and DECoff are the measured RA and DEC offsets between the
rows you want to use. Do not change the sign of the offsets . For
example if you peakup on row 121 and then measure the offset from row 121
to row 146 to be -0.5 -27.8 by moving the telescope, then your exec needs
to contain the line SLIDE -0.5 -27.8.
INFORMATION FOR CREATING CONFIGS
The following sections provide information about selections to make when
defining configs for use with the echelle. Details of all the menu items
and options used to define CGS4 configs are given in the Guide
to CGS4 configs .
3. Optimum Orders
When using the Echelle it is normal to select ECHELLE_AUTO_ORDER as the
grating when defining a config. If this is selected then the CGS4 software
will automatically select the optimum order for your wavelength. The optimum
order gives a higher throughput than other orders. The optimum ordering
software has recently been improved and now works very well for all wavelenghts.
You may wish to use another order, e.g. to get lower or higher spectral
resolution or to increase the spectral coverage. To use a different order
than the optimum one selected automatically, choose ECHELLE as the grating
when defining your config and then explicitely enter the order that you
want.
You can calculate the optimum order for any wavelength as follows. The
blaze angle of the echelle is 64.6 degrees. This corresponds to the product
of wavelength and order (n x lambda) being about 55.0 microns. (e.g., we
find that the transmission at 2.12um in 26th order (n x lambda = 55.1)
is 10X higher than in 25th order (n x lambda = 53.0) In general for any
wavelength, the order for which n x lambda is closest to 55.0 gives the
highest efficiency. However, at lower orders (longer wavelengths), it is
best to fudge this somewhat, as the efficiency drops off more rapidly at
higher angles than at lower angles. The CGS4 software uses a lookup up
table calculated according to the above, with appropriate adjustments at
the longer wavlengths, to select the order for the echelle. If you would
like to examine the table of echelle optimum orders click here
.
4. Order sorting
Longward of 1.3um, CVFs serve as order-blockers for the echelle. Shortward
of 1.3um, narrow band filters (1.083um, 1.233um, 1.257um, 1.282um), allow
echelle observations at important wavelengths. Wavelengths shortwards
of 1.3um may only be observed through these narrow band filters . The
longest wavelength observable with the echelle is 5.7um. The CGS4 software
will automatically select an appropriate filter or set the CVF to the requested
wavelength. It will report an error if your chosen wavelength is outside
the range of either the narrow band filters or the CVFs. Note that a long
wavelength leak is suspected in the short wavelength CVF (roughly H-band),
and is under investigation. If you want to do Echelle spectroscopy in the
H-band please check with your support scientist for an update on this situation.
5. CVF gradients
There is a slight gradient in the transmission of the CVFs along the slit.
The CVF calibration has been set for the middle of the illuminated area,
row 134. If you want to use rows towards the edge of the illuminated region
or nod more than about 30 pixels you may wish to check the CVF calibration
for the rows you will be using. First of all define an astronomical config
for the echelle in the normal way and set to this config. Peakup a star
on the desired row or look at a lamp line and then run MOVIE. Now while
MOVIE is running go into the menu called DIRECT_MOTOR_CONTROL . This menu
allows you to define an intermediate configuration. The menu items diplayed
represent where the CGS4 motors are currently positioned. To check the
CVF calibration try changing the CVF wavelength by a very small amount
and check whether the signal on the MOVIE display increases or decreases.
Once you know what wavelength you want to set the CVF to calculate the
difference between the grating wavelength and the desired CVF wavelength.
You can then use UKIRT_PREP to save an astronomical config with this CVF
offset. Be very careful if you decide to make a change like this - it is
possible to get "lost" in order on the CVFs because at 1-2.5um the Echelle
orders are very close together. For example 2.2um in 25th order is at the
same grating angle as 2.11um in 26th order - so if you move the CVF by
as much as 0.09um you could be looking at the wrong wavelength and order.
6. CVF fringes
Particularly in the thermal IR a ripple is seen in echelle spectra which
is caused by fringing from the CVF. This ripple can be difficult to remove
if there are amplitude variations between your source and your star. If
you observe very strong ripples, try moving the CVF by a very small amount,
or try puttting your source slightly out of focus. I think the latter helps
because it makes the source and the background fill the slit to the same
degree. Also take oversampled flats in preference to the usual undersampled
one.
7. Wavelength Calibration
Because of the narrow wavelength range covered by the array when the echelle
is used, there are wavelengths where it is impossible to find lamp lines
that fall on the array. In this case you may be able to find lamp lines
at different wavelengths that are present at higher or lower order at the
same echelle setting. I.e., for such a line of wavelength lambda there
is an n that gives the same n*lambda as your observing setup, For example,
you want to observe at 3.00um in 16th order, where there is no line, but
notice that there is an Argon line at 2.40um which in 20th order would
appear at the same echelle angle. Such lamp lines can be found by (1) setting
the echelle to the wavelength you wish to observe (ie in this example 2.40um)
with auto-order selected and (2) changing the arc CVF wavelength to the
wavelength of the calibration line. The arc section of a config allows
you to enter a different CVF wavelength for observing arcs than for observing
your source. This arc CVF wavelength will only be used when you take arcs.
At some other wavelengths you will see lamp lines that were not expected
- these are strong lines in a different order and wavelength being transmitted
through the wings of the CVF transmission profile.
At wavelengths beyond the K window, observable lamp lines are generally
few and far between. For calibration with the echelle, one often must use
the above technique for finding arc lines in different orders, telluric
absorption/emission lines (atlases are available in the control room at
HP, and at JAC), or observations of astronomical line sources.
Last Modification Date: 1998/08/12 - Last Modification Author: Tom
Kerr - Original Author: Gillian Wright
Tom Kerr (tkerr)
|