UIST Spectroscopy
|
Read Speed, Exposure Times and Efficiency
|
|
The information below pertains to the new ARC (formerly SDSU)
controller commissioned with UIST in December 2006. For numbers
specific to the old Edict system, please contact the instrument
scientist.
Maximum Exposure Time
IMPORTANT: Currently, because of
memory limitations on the acquisition machine, the MAXIMUM exposure
time possible with UIST is 240 seconds.
Read Speeds and Minimum Exposure Times
The array can be addressed or "clocked" at various speeds.
However, the faster readout rates lead to output
coupling, where a fraction of the signal on one pixel is picked
up on a pixel 8 columns away. Read speeds are therefore limited by a
desire to minimise this effect.
With NDSTARE readout of the full array (used in non-thermal
imaging and all spectroscopy modes), a read time of 622 millisecond
has been adopted; with an additional dwell time of 378 secs, this
means that the array is read out every second. With a 10 second
NDSTARE exposure, the array is read 11 times (12 including the NULL
read), with each read being sampled four times (the digital
averaging). Faster readout is possible with sub-arrays, and of course
the thermal readout modes (used only with thermal imaging), run with
faster readout clocks leading to shorter read times, as shown below.
| Mode | Eng. Ref | Rev. Bias mV | Read Time (sec) |
Dwell Time (sec) | Total Time (sec) |
Samples* |
| NDSTARE 1024 | ND1 | 600 | 0.622 | 0.378 | 1.0 | 4 |
| NDSTARE 512 | ND512 | 600 | 0.184 | 0.016 | 0.2 | 4 |
| NDSTARE 256 | ND256 | 600 | 0.061 | 0.039 | 0.1 | 4 |
| CDS 1024 | CDS1 | 600 | 0.622 | 0.001 | 0.623 | 4 |
| CDS 512 | CDS512 | 600 | 0.184 | 0.001 | 0.185 | 4 |
| CDS 256 | CDS256 | 600 | 0.061 | 0.001 | 0.062 | 4 |
| THERMAL ND 1024 | ND1T | 900 | 0.171 | 0.029 | 0.2 | 1 |
| THERMAL ND 512 | ND512T | 900 | 0.056 | 0.024 | 0.08 | 1 |
| THERMAL ND 256 | ND256T | 900 | 0.021 | 0.019 | 0.04 | 1 |
| THERMAL CDS 1024 | CDS1T | 900 | 0.171 | 0.001 | 0.172 | 1 |
| THERMAL CDS 512 | CDS512T | 900 | 0.056 | 0.001 | 0.057 | 1 |
| THERMAL CDS 256 | CDS256T | 900 | 0.021 | 0.001 | 0.022 | 1 |
| IRPOL CDS 1024 | CDS1P | 900 | 0.171 | 0.001 | 0.172 | 1 |
*Number of digital averages per read.
The READ, DWELL and TOTAL times in the above table represent the following:
- The READ time is time it takes to physically read out the whole array.
- The DWELL is effectively a pause after the READ:
- The DWELL is fixed with NDSTARE - longer exposures are
created by increasing the number of reads. For example, a 0.6sec
NDSTARE 512 exposure would consist of a Null read, a 0.184sec read,
a 0.016sec dwell, a 0.184sec read, a 0.016sec dwell, a 0.184sec read,
a 0.016sec dwell, and finally a 0.184sec read.
- The DWELL is variable with CDS - longer exposures are
created by increasing the dwell time. For example, a 2sec CDS 512
would consist of a Null read, a 0.184sec read, a 1.816sec dwell,
then the final 0.184sec read.
- The TOTAL time listed in the above table is READ + DWELL, and
therefore represents the minimum exposure time with each
readout mode: your exposure time can be (much) longer than this.
Readout Overheads and Efficiency
As described earlier, digital averaging is used to beat down the
read noise in each exposure. The read noise also decreases with longer
exposure times, reaching an optimum above about 60 seconds. Long
exposures are also by far the most efficient. Only saturation on
source or non-linearity, or the desire to collect data before the sky
background changes appreciably, should limit the exposure time used.
If short exposure times must be used, then it may be desirable to
combine these with a number of co-adds. Although this makes each
individual observe less efficient, overall this may be more
efficient when considering the time taken to nod the telescope between
"source" and "sky". Increasing coadds also brings down the read noise
(a little).
| Mode | Expos. Time | Num. Coadds | Noise | Efficiency |
| NDSTARE 1024 | 60 sec | 1 | 8.0 e- | 97% |
| NDSTARE 1024 | 30 sec | 1 | 9.0 e- | 95% |
| NDSTARE 1024 | 10 sec | 1 | 12.5 e- | 90% |
| NDSTARE 1024 | 5 sec | 1 | 15.0 e- | 80% |
| NDSTARE 1024 | 5 sec | 2 | -- | 83% |
| NDSTARE 1024 | 5 sec | 6 | -- | 88% |
| NDSTARE 1024 | 1 sec | 5 | -- | 59% |
| NDSTARE 512 | 0.2 sec | 20 | -- | 42% |
| NDSTARE 512 | 0.2 sec | 40 | -- | 40% |
| NDSTARE 512 | 0.2 sec | 100 | -- | 40% |
| CDS 1024 | 0.623 sec | 20 | -- | 46% |
| CDS 512 | 0.185 sec | 20 | -- | 52% |
| THERMAL CDS 1024 | 0.172 sec | 20 | -- | 53% |
| THERMAL CDS 1024 | 0.172 sec | 100 | -- | 49% |
| THERMAL CDS 512 | 0.057 sec | 20 | -- | . |
| THERMAL CDS 512 | 0.057 sec | 100 | -- | . |
| THERMAL ND 1024 | 0.2 sec | 20 | -- | 67% |
| THERMAL ND 1024 | 0.2 sec | 100 | -- | 54% |
| THERMAL ND 512 | 0.08 sec | 20 | -- | . |
| THERMAL ND 512 | 0.08 sec | 100 | -- | . |
|
NOTE: The efficiencies in the above table include time for the exposure (and
coadds) and the array readout. They do not include time for telescope
moves, e.g. sliding a source up and down the slit (which will take
about 1 sec when using the same guide star).
|
Optimum exposure times
The optimum exposure time is dependent on many factors, such as
resolution, wavelength, object brightness and weather
conditions. Consequently, although clicking on "Default" in the
instrument configuration in an OT sequence will yield a reasonable
exposure time for a specific source magnitude, you may need to
fine-tune this value. Note, however, that generally the maximum
possible exposure time is the optimum exposure time, as
overheads are reduced to a minimum.
Spectroscopy tests during
commissioning, where the same source was observed for the same total
on-source period of time, but using 10sec, then 30sec, then 120sec and
then 240sec exposures clearly showed that the better detection was
obtained with a few long exposures as compared to many short
exposures. Indeed, it seems that 200-240 sec exposure times are
optimum for non-thermal spectroscopy of faint sources, or half of this
if the OH sky lines aren't being subtracted off too well. In imaging
mode, a five or nine-point jitter pattern should probably be acquired within
5-10 minutes, so that a suitable flat field frame can be created from
the median average of the jittered target images.
|