UIST Spectroscopy
|
Spectroscopy: Current Grism Set
|
|
Long-slit spectroscopy
UIST has two 9-slot grism wheels which contain the polarimetry
prisms and the grisms for spectroscopy. 1, 2, 4, 5 and 7-pixel
slits are available for use with each grisms (the exceptions being
the IJ and JH grisms, which have their own 2 and 4-pixel slits - see
previous page). The table below lists the grisms currently available.
Note that with the wider slits the spectral resolution is
reduced, though with the narrower slits it is usually improved,
roughly by the ratio of the slit widths. Unfortunately this is not the
case with the IJ and JH grisms, where only a ~30% improvement
in spectral resolution is seen when the 2-pixel slit is used instead
of the 4-pixel slit.
The spectral resolution with the IFU is roughly equivalent to a
2-pixel slit, so is double that given below.
Click on the name of a grism below...
to see the relative transmission across the passband of that grism.
Each plot shows a spectrum of a bright standard star. The spectrum
has been "normalized" via division of an appropriate black-body
function, thus giving the transmission (though note that the
absolute scale on the y-axis is arbitrary). Absorption due to
the atmosphere plus the telescope and instrument optics (especially
the grism and spectral blocking filter) all contribute to the overall
shape of each plot. Photospheric
absorption lines associated with the standard have not been removed. Note that UIST's throughput drops quite considerably
towards the I-band, and that the long-wavelength end of the JH grism is suppressed
by the blocking filter (see below).
Current Grism set: 27 May 2005 - present
 
Grism (Long-slit) |
Wavelength Range |
Resn 4-pix slit |
Order |
|
Grism (Long-slit) |
Wavelength Range |
Resn 4-pix slit |
Order |
| Short J |
1.024-1.177 | 1500 | 2 | |
Long J |
1.162-1.315 | 2000 | 2 |
| Short H |
1.423-1.625 | 1900 | 2 | |
Long H |
1.603-1.803 | 2000 | 2 |
| Short K |
2.007-2.260 | 1800 | 2 | |
Long K |
2.204-2.513 | 1900 | 2 |
| Short L |
2.905-3.638 | 700 | 1 | |
Long L |
3.620-4.232 | 1200 | 1 |
| IJ |
0.862-1.418 | 320 | 1 | |
JH** |
1.127-1.903 | 450 | 1 |
| HK |
1.395-2.506 | 500 | 1 | |
KL |
2.229-2.987 | 700 | 1 | |
| M |
4.382-5.314 | 1000 | 1 | |
. | . | . | . |
** PLEASE NOTE: The throughput of the JH grism is 1.5 to 2.0-times worse than the IJ
and HK grisms in the J and
H-bands respectively. Therefore, wherever possible, the IJ and HK
grisms should be used in preference.
Also, the blocking filter in use with the JH transmits between 0.85
and 1.80 microns; this impacts JH data in two ways: (1) emission above
1.80 microns is blocked completely, and (2) lines between 0.85 and
0.90 microns may be seen in your data in second order
between 1.70 and 1.80 microns.
|
A comparison of IJ, JH and HK spectra
obtained through a 4-pix slit of HIP 87895 (G2V, V=6.3), after division
by an A0V star (HIP 85382, 5.9 mag) for telluric correction, is given here (wavelength
scales are approximate).
Note also that in RAW data frames the wavelength increases to
the LEFT ; the pipeline software will, however, display the
wavelength increasing to the right (further details are given in the
pages on Data
format).
Low versus Moderate-Resolution Grisms
Should I use a moderate-resolution or a
lower-resolution grism? The answer depends on your needs. The
relative transmissions are similar. However, with most of the
higher-resolution grisms background-limited performance is
essentially impossible, so (read)noise on the array can be a dominating
factor. The higher-resolution grisms work well if one is trying to
detect line emission superimposed on continuum emission, and obviously
they offer higher spectral resolution.
Figure 1: Comparison of short-K (left) and HK (right)
spectral images of the same target, using the same (60 second)
integration time. The data are flat-fielded and sky-subtracted,
though not corrected for telluric absorption (i.e. no division by a
standard star). In addition to continuum from the star, faint H2
emission at 2.122 microns is detected along the slit.
|
To compare the performance of the HK and short-K grisms, a young
star with a line-emission jet was observed with both grisms, using the
4-pixel slit and 60 sec exposures in both cases. In both datasets,
continuum from the star and weak line emission from the jet were
detected (Fig.1). However, in extracted spectra from the jet (Fig.2 -
left) a low-frequency "ripple" is evident in the short-K data which
isn't apparent in the HK data: this is produced by a "chevron"
readnoise pattern across the array, which though variable can dominate
the noise at very low flux levels.
Figure 2: Comparison of short-K (red) and HK
(yellow) spectra extracted from along the jet (left) and from the star
itself (right). Rows 795-805 were extracted and coadded for the left-hand spectra;
optimal extraction was used for the right-hand spectra (for display purposes 3000
counts were added to the short-K spectrum at right). The spectra have not
been smoothed.
|
The short-K spectrum extracted from the star fairs much better
(Fig.2 - right): in this case the main source of noise is the
continuum from the star. At the higher spectral resolution of the
short-K grism, the (spectrally-unresolved) line-emission towards the
star is more prominent in the short-K data than it is in the HK
spectrum.
|