|
UNITED KINGDOM INFRARED TELESCOPE
Newsletter
Issue 19, Autumn 2006
UKIDSS first data release (DR1)
Steve Warren1, Nigel Hambly2 and Simon Dye3
1Imperial College, Univ. of London, U.K.
2 Univ. Edinburgh, U.K.
3 Univ. Cardiff, U.K.
|
Figure 1: Proportion of DR1 data with a given seeing.
|
The first large release of UKIDSS survey-quality data, DR1, took
place on 27 July 2006. This followed on from the Early Data Release,
that took place on 10 February 2006 (reported in the Spring 2006
Newsletter), which was a small prototype dataset. DR1 contains all
the data from the 05A and 05B WFCAM blocks that passed quality
control. The vital statistics of DR1 are summarised in Table 1. As
before the data release comprises two databases. The DR1 database
consists of fields where full coverage of the filter set exists for
the particular survey, and is a subset of the DR1+ database, which
includes also data for fields with partial filter coverage i.e. all
data that passed quality control. The summary provided in the table is
for the smaller DR1 database. But overall in DR1+ there is coverage in
one filter or another of over 1000 sq degs. DR1 marks the point where
UKIDSS overtook 2MASS in terms of source photons collected -
quantified by the product: telescope collecting area x
f.o.v. x summed integration time. At this point UKIDSS
has completed some 7% of the 7-year plan.
Full details of DR1, including maps of the areas covered, are contained
in a submitted paper, Warren et al. (2006,
astro-ph/0610191). The image
quality is good, with median seeing 0.82"+/-0.14". The distribution of
the seeing, over all the frames released in DR1, is illustrated in Fig.
1. In fact some small improvement to this quantity may be expected for
future releases, since the 05A data suffered from imperfect alignment of
the optics, and compensation of instrument flexure was not implemented
until after the end of 05B.
The next release, DR2, is penciled in for the end of February 2007.
Table 1: Depth and coverage in fields with the full filter
complement in
UKIDSS DR1
| Survey | Area | Filters | K-band depth |
| | (sq. degs) | | (5sigma Vega) |
| Large Area Survey | 190 | YJHK | 18.2 |
| Galactic Clusters Survey | 52 | ZYJHK | 18.2 |
| Galactic Plane Survey | 77 | JHK(+H2) | 18.1 |
| Deep ExtraGalactic Survey | 3.1 | JK | 20.7 |
| Ultra Deep Survey | 0.8 | JK | 21.6 |
Accessing WFCAM data from the WFCAM Science Archive
Mike Read
Wide-Field Astronomy Unit, IfA, University of Edinburgh, U.K.
As part of its involvement in the Vista Data Flow System (VDFS)
project, the Wide-Field Astronomy Unit (WFAU) in Edinburgh has
developed the WFCAM Science
Archive (WSA).
The WSA holds the calibrated image and catalogue data products
generated by the Wide Field Camera (WFCAM) on UKIRT and processed by
the Cambridge Astronomical Survey Unit (CASU). (Raw WFCAM data is
archived by CASU and ESO.) The primary contents of the archive
originate from the UKIRT InfraRed Deep
Sky Surveys (UKIDSS): Large Area Survey (LAS), Galactic Plane
Survey (GPS), Galactic Clusters Survey (GCS), Deep Extragalactic
Survey (DXS) and the Ultra Deep Survey (UDS). Released in July 2006,
the first UKIDSS data release (DR1) is formed from several Terabytes
of data and contains over 100 million sources. In addition the WSA
also archives non-survey data taken for open-time programmes
(e.g. PATT, service data, Japanese and University of Hawaii data, etc.).
On transfer to WFAU, the catalogues and image meta-data are passed
through a number of curation tasks prior to being loaded into a
Relational DataBase Management System (RDBMS). The curation process
also produces a number of enhanced data products: for example, object
catalogues merged across several passbands, deep stacks for the DXS
and UDS, and cross-matching with other data products (e.g. SDSS and
2MASS).
Figure 1: Screen shots from the WSA. Top row from left to right:
Batch pixel finding charts (MultiGetImage); menu driven query builder;
browsable archive listing. Middle row: SQL query form; SQL query results;
results displayed in TOPCAT. Bottom row: schema browser; image cut-outs,
library jpegs of archived files. Click on the above image for a detailed
view.
|
Users can access the data held in the WSA in a number of ways via a
set of web forms. The services provided currently include: browsing
and downloading archived FITS images and catalogues, creating image
cut-outs, performing simple cone-searches on catalogues,
cross-matching archived sources with a supplied list of coordinates
and using the power and flexibility of the Structured Query Language
(SQL) to mine the data. A simple illustration of the last technique is
shown in the central three panels of the screen shot in Figure 1.
Here a query selecting the type (star/galaxy) and J-H and H-K colours
of objects in a given region of the LAS is submitted. The results are
written to a FITS catalogue which are then launched into the Starlink
package Topcat (Tool for OPerations on Catalogues And Tables) and
used to produce a colour-colour plot. This particular example took
under a minute from query to plot. A cookbook is provided to help
astronomers unfamiliar with SQL.
Future plans for WSA include implementing Virtual Observatory
access via Astrogrid and possibly services providing user-defined
image mosaicing and stacking.
Users must be registered with the WSA in order to access UKIDSS
data or their non-survey (PATT, etc.) data whilst still under
proprietary periods. Details on registration and further information
on the WSA are given on the website. Feedback and questions should be
addressed to wsa-support at roe-dot-ac-dot-uk.
Moon ghosts in WFCAM data
Daniel Mortlock1, Steve Warren1,
Dave Henry2 and Andy Adamson3
1 Imperial College, Univ. of London, U.K.
2 UKATC, Edinburgh, U.K.
3 JAC, Hilo, U.S.A.
The very large number of frames taken for the UKIDSS project has made it
possible to assess the end-to-end performance of the telescope, the WFCAM
instrument, the pipeline, and the WFCAM Science Archive (WSA), and to
identify and diagnose problems with the data. While in most respects
(depth, image quality, uniformity) the data have lived up to expectations,
a number of unpredicted artefacts have been identified. These include
cross-talk images of bright stars, channels with bias offsets, and images
of dirt on the field lens -- a rogues' gallery is provided in
Dye et al. (2006). Most serious are a number of large, bright ghost images,
an example of which is shown in Fig. 1. This article describes how the
cause of these bright ghosts has been deteremined, and how they can be
eliminated.
Figure 1: Image showing the four WFCAM arrays as they are positioned
on the sky. The diamond in the centre represents the WFCAM CCD
(optical) autoguider. A bright moon ghost appears in array 2 (bottom
left). The artifact in array 1 (bottom right) is caused by a support pad
residual on the field lens, which has since been removed.
|
As can be seen from Fig. 1, ghosts such as this are sufficiently large
and bright to render the affected exposure unusable. Anecdotally, ghosts
were believed to occur when the Moon is near the field, but this was not
always the case, leaving the cause, and the solution, unclear. The problem
was deemed serious enough to undergo the painstaking task of visually
inspecting all available UKIDSS exposures as part of the quality control
for the EDR and DR1. The JPEG images provided by the WSA make the task
straightforward, if still timeconsuming -- in all, over 10000 images were
viewed. In all, some 6% of exposures are adversely affected by ghosts
(although this includes negative images caused by a positive ghost in the
frame used for sky subtraction). This is clearly an unacceptably large
figure, corresponding to a loss of 60 nights observing over the lifetime
of UKIDSS.
Figure 2: Plot of frames with Moon ghosts (filled black symbols)
and unaffected frames (open symbols, coloured according to Moon
phase, from red = full to blue = new). The axes are the (absolute)
angular separation of the Moon from the field in RA and dec. Ghosts
apparently occur in a restricted patch that approximately corresponds to
the position of the arrays in an expanded mirage of the focal plane
(also illustrated).
|
Having determined the scale of the problem, the next step was to
confirm that the Moon was in fact the source of the ghosts and then to
find a way to avoid this in the future. Under the assumption that the
ghosts are caused by a reflection, we explored a variety of variables
including angular distance between the field and the Moon, angular
distance of the Moon from the line of the slit, and Moon phase,
plotting the affected and unaffected frames. It became evident that
ghosts almost always occur when the Moon is within 30 deg of the
field, in which case a ghost has about a 30% chance of appearing. A
clear picture emerged, illustrated in Fig. 2, when the data were
plotted in terms of (absolute) angular separation of the Moon from the
field in RA and dec. This assumes that the problem is symmetric in RA
and Dec, and folds the sky into a quadrant. It is immediately clear
that ghosts only occur in a patch of this quadrant. Effectively the
figure is a mirage of the focal plane, expanded by a factor of ~60,
and a ghost occurs when the Moon lands on an array. The filling
factor of arrays on the focal plane is about 0.3, in agreement with
the observed fractional occurence of ghosts when the Moon is nearer
than 30 deg. This hypothesis was partially confirmed by a controlled
experiment, undertaken on an engineering night, when a series of
images at selected offsets from the Moon was taken, but only along the
diagonal of Fig. 2.
Final confirmation of this picture came when the original optical analysis to
check for ghosts was extended to larger angles than previously considered.
Ray tracing successfully reproduced the phenomenon in detail, correctly
accounting for the ghost shape and location, for a given angular displacement
of the Moon. The ghost arises when the moon shines obliquely on the
autoguider auxiliary lens, above the field lens, and the light path
undergoes a double internal reflection in the field lens. Shadowing by the
barrel of the auxiliary lens assembly itself explains the form, steadily
reducing the size of the ghost at larger angles, until the ghost disappears
at an angle of 31 deg.
As important as it is to understand the nature of this problem, the real aim
of the investigation was to eliminate the ghosts. The simplest solution is
to avoid observing within 30 deg of the Moon. Indeed this procedure was
followed throughout the 06A WFCAM block. Nevertheless because many UKIDSS
fields lie near the ecliptic, this has serious implications for scheduling,
and adversely affected progress in some fields in 06A. Fortunately the
optical analysis indicates that a simple conical baffle below the auxiliary
lens will eliminate the problem. The baffle is being manufactured, and it is
intended that it be installed and its effectiveness tested at the start of
the 06B observing block.
References
Dye, S., et al., 2006, MNRAS, in press
(astro-ph/0603608)
View from the Top
Thor Wold
UKIRT/Joint Astronomy Centre
We're back to cass now; WFCAM has come off for a spell, and we are
hard-pressed to try to get back some of the cass time that was utterly wiped
out earlier this year by the "weather of biblical proportions".
At the time of the publication of the last Newsletter, we were
unknowingly just entering a period of rather unprecedented bad weather...
A series of low-pressure systems set
themselves up 200 miles west of Kaua'i, held in place by an unusual blocking
pattern. If this had set up 100 or 200 miles further west, nobody would
have noticed anything. As soon as one would weaken and start to move off to
the north, it was replaced by yet another. One low-pressure system managed
to sit in this spot for six weeks straight. Meteorologists here said this
was a once-in-a-career happening; it made for the wettest March in Hawai'i
in 55 years. They do hope that the data they have accumulated from this
event will better prepare future forecasters for when it occurs again.
The flow over this island was such that we found ourselves in the
tail of a continuous stream of high clouds and embedded thunderstorms giving
the summit bouts of snow, ice, fog and utterly opaque cloud. The flow was
from the "wrong" direction, meaning that the leeward and windward sides of
the island reversed - this meant Hilo and Hamakua did not see the epic
rainfall that the smaller, northern islands did; the mountains managed to
block the weather from getting to the eastern side of this island. Winds
were predominantly from the southeast or south.
Some of the Grim Statistics: in March, a dam burst on Kaua'i,
killing 6 people. We had 22 days of flash-flood warnings, and only five days of
tradewinds. There was a tornado on Lana'i, and large hail here on Hawai'i
Island (both are extremely rare events). While Honoka'a and Waimea on this
island got about 2" of rain in March, Lihue Airport on Kaua'i got 36.13" -
ten times greater than the average rainfall for the month as determined from
the past 30 years worth of data!
The rains started February 14th and finally went away April 13th.
Meanwhile, atop Mauna Kea...
total jac weather jac weather web ukirt weather
date web page hits page hits per hour loss percentage
------------- ----------------- ------------------ ---------------
2006 april 17727 24.6 30.2%
--> 2006 march --> 26753 --> 36.0 --> 87.3%
2006 february 16220 24.1 48.3%
2006 january 16769 22.5 36.5%
2005 december 20380 27.4 30.8%
2005 november 14524 20.2 28.2%
2005 october 16670 22.4 24.9%
(Thanks to Jonathan Kemp for these statistics; other statistics are from
the Honolulu Advertiser).
Personally, I did not have a full night of observing between Feb 14
and April 13. I lost four whole shifts where I never left HP even for a
single night. I lost both of my two shifts in March in a row and again
never left HP. Except for the occasional foray to the telescope to
see how bad things were, we were imprisoned at HP.
I can state unequivocally that I have never experienced anything
like this in 20 years on Mauna Kea! From what the meteorologists are
saying, it is unlikely to happen again for 20-30 years, if not 55 (like this
one). We hope...
Road improvements
A word of caution; when driving up Saddle Road to the Mauna Kea
Access Road turnoff, be prepared to encounter construction. The overhaul of
18 miles of Saddle Road, from around the 19 mile mark to around the 35 mile
mark at Mauna Kea State Park commenced towards the end of July. $59 million
has been budgeted for the project, and scheduled completion is in early June
2008. We will keep you informed on progress, of course.
Currently, activity is concentrated on the intersection of Saddle
Road and the Access Road, as they are starting from there and heading back
to the 19 mile mark, which is about where the forest begins. During the
realignment and construction back towards the 19 mile mark, there are likely
to be significant periods of intense construction, temporary detours, etc.
For the moment, if you are coming to visit us do expect to encounter heavy
equipment and construction activity as you near the turnoff to Hale Pohaku.
Later, while they will be straightening the roadbed, there will also be
significant stretches where they will be following the existing roadbed,
necessitating tearing it up entirely.
Installation of the new traffic signals at the intersection of
Nowelu and Komohana near JAC has been underway now for several weeks, but we
have yet to see any of the poles, as they have been involved with
digging through the rock to install the under-road wiring. Traffic flow
through this project has been a bit of a mess and highly varied as to
which lanes are open on any given day. This ought to be up and working
soon. Again, we hope.
Hale Pohaku
The work on replacing the outside siding of
Building B at Hale Pohaku is finally making noticeable progress. They
have managed to make the turn around the back side of the building and
have finally begun finishing the last wall (the Mauna Kea side). In the
past six months, they have spent the time replacing the decking on the
walkway to the dorms, the entry and the south deck of the Commons
Building, rather than just finishing off the Building B project.
Periodically, they were trying to keep people out of the rooms on that
side (just in case?), causing a bit of a crunch in the other two dorm
buildings. Regular readers of this space will know that this project has
been in a continuing status since its first mention in the fall 2004
edition of this Newsletter - meaning this project has passed its third
anniversary. Well past time it was over with.
Internet connections have now been installed in all of the rooms.
Otherwise things are much the same. I now know folks that book
themselves into Building D with its miniature beds simply because they
know the bedding will stay put and not come off (that's me -
Ed!), since the sheets still don't quite fit the 'new' queen-size beds
in B and C dorms. The hot/cold water surges are making a comeback, so
residents of HP are again learning how to do the HP Shuffle to avoid
being scalded/frozen. Put your dancing shoes on...
Aloha!
UNITED KINGDOM INFRARED TELESCOPE
Newsletter
Issue 19, Autumn 2006
|