Wavefront Sensing on UKIRT
Wavefront
Sensing on UKIRT
Latest Wavefront Results
The following plots illustrate the magnitudes of Zernikes applied to
UKIRT to correct for low-order aberrations. These are derived from
analysis of monthly wavefront-sensing observations, which allow us to
monitor, on a month-by-month basis, the accuracy of the primary figure
and
the alignment of the secondary. The plots show the Peak-to-Valley
Zernike
values derived that have been entered each month into the telescope
model;
In all cases units are in nanometers. The sine (S) or cosine (C)
dependence of each Zernike with respect to the telescope hour angle
(H) and declination (D) are also modelled and included in these plots.
Following Noll (1976, J.Opt.Soc.A., 66, 207; see also the discussion
below), the RMS variation across the wavefront
associated with each Zernike (aberration) is given by dividing by
the appropriate scaling constant, e.g.:
Astigmatism; Z5, Z6 / (6)0.5
Coma; Z7, Z8 / (8)0.5
Trefoil; Z9, Z10 / (8)0.5
Spherical; Z11 / (5)0.5
Back to the Top
Background
UKIRT's optical performance is measured by Curvature Sensing
(Roddier & Roddier, 1993. J.Opt. Soc., America A, 10, 2278)
in which images from either side of focus are subtracted and
normalised to yield a Laplacian of the wavefront which is then
obtained by integration. The wavefront sensor (Roddier et
al. 1994. Proc. SPIE, 2199, 1172) was constructed at the JAC
and normally resides on the east port of the Instrument Support
Unit. It comprises an optical bench enclosed in a rigid box and
supporting a commercial filter wheel located at the telescope focus, a
camera lens of 250mm focal length and an Astrocam CCD on which the
lens forms an image of the secondary. (A 50mm lens may be installed
instead, to re-image the focal plane on the CCD for study of in-focus
stellar images.) The Astrocam CCD has a pixel scale of 0.314
arcsec/pixel,
normally binned to 3x3 to give 0.942 arcsec/pixel.
The filter wheel carries two pairs of AR-coated
positive and negative lenses, one of ±1m and one of ±2m
focus, a knife-edge and a clear aperture.
In use, after alignment
on a star and focussing the image of the illuminated secondary mirror
on the CCD, images are taken in sequential pairs defocused by means of
the lenses (almost all data has been taken with the ±1m lens
pair). The two defocused images are then spatially aligned,
subtracted, normalised and iteratively analysed for the resulting
Zernike polynomials.
Wavefront sensing on UKIRT began in earnest
in August 1996 after the installation of the new tip-tilt secondary
mirror. This campaign is aimed at characterising the telescope optical
system and its performance as a function of Hour Angle and
Declination, as well as to discern any seasonal variations which may
be present throughout the year. Thus the campaign took the form of
measuring the wavefronts from approx. 60 stars spread across the full
sky field of view of UKIRT at regular monthly intervals.
The
information gained from this campaign allowed us to develop a
telescope lookup model which could be used to actively figure
the telescope during a nights observing to correct for astigmatism,
trefoil and spherical aberrations. Coma is corrected for by secondary
mirror alignment.
Back to the Top
Zernike
Polynomials
The orthogonal Zernike polynomials (in polar
coordinates) used in our analysis of the measured wavefronts are
adapted from Noll (1976, J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 66, p. 207):
| Astigmatism |
 |
| Coma |
 |
| Trefoil |
 |
| Spherical |
 |
Here, rho and theta represent the radius and rotation angle
in the circular wavefront (with respect to the axial centre of the
optical system), with rho normalised to unity at the edge of the
wavefront image. Note that these polynomials are equivalent to
Peak-to-Valley variations across the wavefront (see above).
Back to the Top
"Typical" Wavefront images and errors
Click on the following link to see a typical
wavefront image, before and after subtraction of the Zernike
polynomials.
Back to the Top
Gemini Comparison Tests
In January 1998, Gemini staff brought their Shack-Hartmann wavefront
sensing equipment to UKIRT to run some comparison tests with a view to
not only test their system, but for UKIRT staff to simultaneously
evaluate
the use of a Shack-Hartmann system over the present curvature sensing
technique.
The results were very favourable for both camps with no compelling
evidence
which points to a preference of one system over another.
Back to the Top
JOSE Results
UKIRT periodically takes data for the Joint Observatory Seeing
Experiment.
The results are analysed by staff at Imperial College (follow the link
to http://op.ph.ic.ac.uk/ukirt/
).
|